Search results

You shouldn't live that way...

This a typical tactic of the Darwinist. They are asked to provide evidence, they proclaim how popular their idea is and then get upset when their pathetic attempts to derail the topic get called on them. Then engage over the evidence. Nope. It's a logical fallacy to assert that the...

It's not OK to be a homo.

It's not OK to be gay.

Homos should get back in the closet where they belong.

A "valid" appeal to authority cannot overturn a competing theory. Darwinists use appeals to authority to deny challengers a seat at the table. They always use it in an invalid fashion.

Leftists don't care about the meaning of words. They only care about how words make them feel, or what they think others will feel because of them.

It's a pity that your idols are all dead.

So quit screeching about people presenting reasons to question the US election. Of course I have. Everything I have said is backed up by news reports, polls and company actions, and I have referenced those sources. For example, Hunter Biden was mixed up with billionaires. The New York Post...

To be fair, voter fraud is hardly much of a crime. It's right up there with jaywalking, in the big scheme of things. The real problem with Muppets such as Brain is that they are pro-abortion, pro-homo socialists.

Oh, so you're racist now? Let's clue you in: Where I'm from is no rational counter to the evidence I present. So when you insist that people should either accept your ideas or move to Russia, that's not an attempt to silence them. Gotcha.

Yeah, and guess what? We do present evidence. But all you do is screech. Something about JFK's son now. So we just have to take your word for it? Nope. Everywhere. Except when you say that if I don't like something I should move to Saudi Arabia instead of expressing myself. Gotta love it, huh?

Interpretation? It's English, buddy. If you don't like it, by all means, explain why we must consider some ideas to be "science" and others not rather than applying the same standard to all of them.

Do QAnon people present evidence? Are you capable of assessing that evidence and providing your own to show them how what they say cannot be true? Nope. You don't. You just screech. Which investigation confirmed the integrity of the election? I don't care about election results. Perhaps one...

Science is the process of throwing out ideas. It can never show anything.

It's simple. You made a thread to mock people who believe something. Then when those people produce evidence, you screech and wail and ridicule, but refuse to offer any substance to deny what you are presented with. We can go through your post and cut them down to two words that are the grand...

Biden won in an illegitimate manner. Get over it already. Boo hoo. Saudi Arabia. Random insult. Sane people recognize that there is the law, implying a lawgiver. Boo hoo. Saudi Arabia. Random insult. Go cry into a box of cornflakes. Console yourself with a glass of semi skimmed milk...

The projection is palpable. Quite the opposite. I get to copy and paste the evidence. This invariably leads to long, vitriolic rants from you that contain not even an attempt to present reasons to disbelieve what I say. Accept the reality of the situation. Yes, Joebiden is in the White...

But all we have from you to support your assertion is screeching. Facts. Hunter Biden was mixed up with billionaires and Joe Biden was linked to the flow of money by the laptop. Evidence, you screech? Sure. We have the laptop. We have witness accounts of the deals. We have Joe Biden on video...

You need to get a grasp on reality. But all you will do is screech. You demand evidence. You mock and ridicule. But you never engage rationally. Hunter Biden was mixed up with foreign billionaires. Fact. Brain's counter? "Russian media." Joe Biden was linked to the flow of cash through...