Search results

This is why governments ban guns

I'm sure there is. But it doesn't offset the shrinkage.

The opposite. It is compacting. Every time there is an earthquake, rocks move toward the core. It's similar to how the volume decreases when you shake a bucket of stones.

Oil deposits require a process to bury vast amounts of plant life under cement rich, sediment rich water. The Hydroplate theory sets up the conditions to achieve this with supplies of all four elements: Plant life was more extensive and grew larger in the pre-flood world. Water erupted all...

Near enough to it. :) You're totally unique, just like the rest of us... :D "Ex nihilo" That would seem counterproductive. Also, if it is ongoing, it is at a rate so tiny in comparison with the initial action to be negligible. The "stretching out" of the Bible is in all likelihood a vastly...

The proponents of the expansion of space idea hold that no position in the universe is unique. Thus, no matter where you are, you are at the center.

Mid-ocean ridges. Mile-deep deposits all over the world of water-laid rock filled with billions of drowned or squashed things. Geomagnetism. Asteroids, including Pluto and Charon. There is not a single large-scale feature of the Earth anyone can point to that is not most easily explained by the...

I think — and the only source I have on this idea is me — that God created a firmament with a hole in it. The hole was the source of the four rivers that watered the garden. The moon lifted and dropped the firmament twice a day, pumping water into and out of the rivers (or perhaps only out and...

If the pressure had remained stable, it would not have breached the crust.

According to the Biblical timeline, it took from about day 6 to the start of the flood. So about 2,200 years.

If the Earth were perfectly spherical, there would be a global ocean about 2km deep.

I'm not sure that's a complete description. I thought it was only an informal fallacy. I find it real easy. Is a Darwinist presenting reasons for what he believes? Yes? Then he has his assumptions among his evidence. What I will agree with you on is that it is a common fallacy to find...

That's not gniess.

Evolutionists don't have a working theory on how rocks form.

What would it even mean to be limited by time? You mean like how people are limited in the number of actions they can perform per minute? I would agree. God isn't limited to a number of actions per minute. If you're saying that He can't be limited by what year it is and that He must be able to...

Begging the question is not a formal fallacy. All it shows is laziness. If people would simply state the things they hold as presuppositions, they would not be committing that error.

I find it extremely difficult to engage with that process. Not that I think it's an inherently bad method, but because it fails the test of "what would it imply were it true?" I find devil's advocate arguments are only useful in refining an argument that I actually believe and that I can...

We should make a deal about what we are allowed to mean when we say "crust." Are we going to use it the way an evolutionist would, a Hydroplate theorist or develop a generic understanding?

I should quit with the analogies. They suck. :D

I'm sure it's just a phase you're going through. :D