Search results

He's the greatest. :D

Simple. Fred put forward a scenario that involved no force. You found the hypothetical man guilty. Now you're trying to justify your idiotic response by pretending that your hypothetical should replace Fred's and asserting that the lack of evidence is evidence.

You can make up as many things as you like to put in bold font and insert into someone else's ideas. They are still not his ideas.

And you found him guilty. Do you need it spelled out in a larger font or something?

He presented a scenario that had no force. You called the man guilty.

Hello there, Stupid. I'm not advocating Fred's ideas. You judged a man guilty in the hypothetical situation where a woman had regret. You can't edit the posts. They are right there.

You're determined to believe that Fred said something that he didn't. You're a liar.

His scenario has no force. Then retract your assessment.

His scenario has no force. You find the man guilty.

You believe that a woman is justified in accusing a man because she has regrets. His scenario has no force. You find the man guilty.

Then respond honestly to the scenario that he presented. There was no force involved. You made it up.

He's silly, you're a dishonest liar. He presented a scenario, you changed it to chase your goal of demonizing him. There was none in the scenario he presented. You made it up. You contribute nothing but spam.

Too late. English, dude. English. Why do I have to address what Clete said? You're the liar, not him.

Lamely. This was not in the scenario. You made it up. You can read, right? That was not in the scenario. You made it up. That Fred does say this makes him an idiot. But you're the liar. You provide nothing but lame, repetitive and boring lies that add nothing to any discussion. Fun isn't it?

Nope. You made it up. You're a liar. That's called spam. What planet are you on? Clete is always disgusted and exasperated.

You were given a scenario. That scenario did not show evidence of force. You gave a verdict. What you want is for someone to have evil ideas that you can cry about, and you're so desperate for it that you invent the ideas for them. You provide nothing but spam.

Hmmm. Nobody knows what you're talking about. Nobody has said that a spouse has the right to force themselves on their partner. Nobody. I don't even need to have read any posts to know that's true. All we have are your inventions. I read the thread. It ain't here. It's only in your head...

He gave a verdict. He thinks it's rape if a woman has regrets.

Inventing ideas and making believe others hold them is dishonest and stupid. You bring nothing to this site but spam.

Nobody knows what you're talking about. Of course you are. Nobody has said that a spouse has the right to force themselves on their partner. I get it. It's a clumsy, stupid point of view. But it's not a dishonest load of spam, which is all you ever provide. Bye, loser.