Search results

We'll take that as a "no."

Darwinists will do anything to avoid answering the question.

Darwinists will do anything to avoid the question.

Of course. A simple thought experiment exposes the mutual exclusivity. God tells me exactly what I will post. Can I do otherwise?

Darwinists will do anything to avoid answering the question.

If my thought experiment is intact, it shows mutual exclusivity. Your additions are, to be blunt, a distraction.

I disagree. If everything is known, we have no choice about what we will do. Exhaustive foreknowledge and human wills are mutually exclusive. My ice cream thought experiment shows this.

Darwinists will do anything to avoid the question.

But you won't answer the question. Telling.

Reported.

Yeah, I get you. I just don't see any need.

HERETIC! Burn him at the stake!!!!111

That would be adding to the scenario. Sure, we know that for those who love God, they will tend to act in a manner that they think would please Him. People who hate Him might be even more predictable. However, in the general scenario, the choice is always up to the man.

For example, a determinist is presented with the following: God puts vanilla and chocolate ice cream in front of a man and tells him that he will choose chocolate. Can the man choose vanilla? The determinist will do anything but answer the question.

I don't think the thought experiment needs a lot of formalization. Determinism and freedom are utterly incompatible. All the formalism needs to go into disguising explanations that they are compatible.

Uh, I dunno. Let's say that he did.

Anyone who would deny a man capacity to be armed to the teeth hates justice and loves anarchy.

More guns.

You make no sense. :)

You want me to find your US constitution in the Bible? Why?