Search results

What would you prove to us? That every combination possible already exists within the deck? No, we just realize that the data and every experiment ever performed only shows Kind after Kind. God just happens to affirm the facts…. How is that? Every single fossil of any creature you care to name...

Because there’s never been any to explain…..

Interpretation instead of literal reading???? Sort of like the dozens of scientific theories about any subject… everyone has their own interpretation of the data…

What evidence? Every single creature in the fossil record shows absolutely zero evidence of evolutionary change for any fossils found of that creature. That is all Tiktaalik fossils found remain distinctly Tiktaalik…. All T-Rex fossils found remain distinctly T-Rex. Etc, etc, etc, ad nauseum…...

It doesn’t first appear until around 1515 and we have copies much older than that…

Agreed it’s a topic for a different thread…. But that’s about it…

All fine except every single person on here understands quite well what I mean when I say there is exactly “zero” evidence of any creature in the fossil record changing over time. So then trying to divert to semantics is just that… a diversion tactic to avoid discussing the fact that they can’t...

And yet you “still” haven’t shown one shred of evidence of any creature changing over time into another creature in my quest to seek truth…. So you are saying your no help at all…

Yes they are contradictory that way. Keeps them from having to actually stick with any one claim…

Exactly why I simply ask for any examples of any creature in the fossil record showing evolutionary changes. None exist. Now I’m not saying they won’t show two distinct creatures and claim a magical missing common ancestor that can’t be found didn’t evolve into both, but then again imagination...

That’s apelike creature not ape. Evolutionists get their panties in bunches over that distinction…. But either way agreed…

Yes after realizing He forgot to include it originally He must have caught His mistake post edit…..

I know. Instead they insert imaginary missing common ancestors every place they need evolution to have occurred…. My words were just fine. Perhaps it’s only you that chose not to read them as they were written because there’s not one shred of evidence of any change in the fossil record….

Except Jesus said man was from the beginning of creation. So either creation happened billions of years ago and man existed then or Jesus was confused. In which case why believe anything else he had to say.

First found written in the margins and later put into some Bibles.

No we wouldn’t have change…. Neither the Husky nor the Mastiff would have changed over time into the Chinook… As we know in reality the Husky stayed a Husky, the Mastiff stayed a Mastiff. Although if you wish to consider the falsity of evolution over time by mutation and contemplate the fossil...

I’m still waiting for your one example of any change in any creature in the fossil record…

Show me one single fossil of any “creature” that shows any changes over time that supports their belief that fish became philosophers…. Every Tiktaalik fossil found remains distinctly Tiktaalik… every T-Rex fossil found remains distinctly T-Rex…. Every single one of them show absolutely zero...

Except with plumbing we can actually see reproducible results…. Shall we start with the fossil record in which every single solitary fossil found of every single solitary creature remains the same for that creature for every fossil found of that creature… i.e. there exists not one shred of...