Search results

A deity.

Oh -- get out of town. How so? It beats a pretend scaffolding attached to an unproveable, unfathomable force.

No, its delicious.

Yes it can. Okay, I am in the sense that It is systematic and leads to storage of information over time. It is in no way a sentient or executive intelligence though. Only from a warped misunderstanding that the status quo should be maintained. It changes the genes. Leave your values aside.

Through a harm reduction model of contingency management and a rubric of mutual solidarity ie social contract with my fellow humans. How's your authoritarian prism from the iron age that cloaks and refracts your own biases working for you?

They are positive.

Even in the simplistic way you are looking at it, a mutation by repetition adds information. It literally adds a substrate for the environment to have "it's" say about. It could possibly be just noise for a while in the gene pool. However, it could alone or in combination with other mutations...

Foolishness. Dawkins has been entirely consistent in his stance. He allows that he does not know with absolute certainty that there wasn't intelligent input during evolution but he is 99.99% sure there wasn't. You reward his acknowledgment that he is not an absolute arbiter of truth by saying...

How about love and affection?

Is this joke funny?: Why wouldn't the Amish parent's take their daughter back after Rumspringa? She was too Mennonite.

Yes - some say they have sex with the same gender. Seems like groupthink to me. When discussing evolution? When discussing entertainment?

What? Were you a prison guard at Auschwitz in a past life or something? You mean like you did with gays? I have observed in the last weeks various such comments from your entourage; Posters going out of their way to add an anti-gay comment for no good reason, and finally reflected upon it...

Okay. Divider divided the forest into clusters and missed the interconnectedness of all species of animals. The multi-method multi-lab approach with double blind controls argues against confirmation bias.

Nice but maybe answer the question I asked or do not quote me when you have a rando comment. I looked into it and only the persons accused of violent actions or conspiracy with those who are accused of violent actions were denied bail. I thought these people are the ones who you believe deserve...

"This" can be interpreted to mean your whole previous sentence. The ambiguity is the result of poor writing. The convergence of what we can infer from observable evolution and the fossil record is compelling proof. Told you so. Part of your shell game is to ask for proof in certain areas...

That would be you. That's the plain meaning of your sentence. You will never see a new kind in an example I can give because observable births of one generation to the next will always be similar enough for YOU to interpret it as the same kind. Birds of different species who mate and produce...

What does the philosophical part refer to? It appears well supported to me. Who observed God do that? Or do you mean just the rest is observable? So, you are going to ignore the whole field of geology in regard to how rock layers form?

Pandimwits! LOL.

I have not been opposing any model. I am trying to understand how the model of evolution is supported. Where have you offered a concise description of your model?

Oh, just like Texas Roadhouse designs its new restaurants with an old-timey aesthetic? Do we have fossil record of the trees in the garden of Eden? How do we know they did not have one big ring each? Seems like a convenient rationalization. But, I give you credit for not going the outright...