Search results

I try to follow your links @ffreeloader but I think to myself, before I go looking at something on, quote-unquote "odysee.com" I'm going to check the Democrats' New York Times, and the Republicans' Wall Street Journal, and then something foreign like Financial Times, or something non-partisan...

No I wouldn't call it encourage, no. I would call it perhaps . . . a loophole? It's like an Easter egg. It's like when you study some riddle and you finally figure it out. Your view is, I've heard it referred to as, "scrupulosity". In Catholic land, that's what your view is called...

Federal. Let's say someone's arrested for a crime, is it Constitutional to provide him with government-subsidized legal representation? Is it Constitutional for the federal government to provide this government service, to this arrested person? Free legal care? I know the answer.

Show me the explicit or interpreted limitation on provision of government services like curbside litter collection, schools, road building and maintenance, etc.?

It doesn't forbid it either.

lol you really know how to hurt a guy RD

Yeah there's nothing un-Constitutional about providing more government services. In fact the most important government service we provide is our government itself! Without this we'd be in a perpetual state of war. And second in line is our glorious military. Our troops defend not only our...

'Told you.

Meanwhile, someone's lighting up right in front of a powder keg https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-putin-kyiv-western-europe-4e2a185188fa94200161b831d6692683 Putin is a Fool of Biblical Proportions.

No, all the Republican legislators knew this, so they imposed strict accounting rules so that what you're saying happens doesn't happen.

You're hoodwinked all right, you're supporting Putin the Patent Idiot. By "skillfully" avoiding being "hoodwinked" by your own country's own two political parties (that actually win elections), you're instead now stumping for Putin the Enormous Fool. How clever of you to hide from your own...

You misunderstand. In this narrow sense I agree with you and Doser that he handled the pandemic expertly and not either irresponsibly, unreasonably, or irrationally, but how the pandemic bit him in the patootie was that he couldn't gather up himself enough to continue his flawless...

Spot on.

We could have done that to the South after the Civil War but we didn't. I don't think that was a mistake. We're aiming for a more perfect peace in the future, we have to pick up the pieces and make omelets out of broken eggs and lemonade out of lemons for now. He's got to die sometime too...

The OP. :)

OK. Agreed, but I don't endorse using nuclear weapons against Russians who are not guilty in retribution.

https://apnews.com/article/overdose-deaths-opioids-fentanyl-8cb302a70ddbb6a435f9e8fbb19f153b

Yeah I'm not into that.

I didn't say they couldn't turn themselves in.