Search results

To be fair, most of the question were address in one way or another via the videos he posted. Certainly not all of them and not as directly as I would have liked but it wouldn't be fair to say that they weren't addressed at all.

That is an excellent question. If what we've presented isn't sufficient then what would be? I am still holding out hope that what we've presented has been sufficient and that the verdict of Dave's mind will be in favor of the round earth, by the way.

Yes, indeed! I've also read the book upon which the material in the video is based. The Witness of The Stars by E.W. Bullinger

Astronomy, not astrology. I'm pretty sure none of us are into astrology.

If you'll recall, there was a protracted discussion about a certain boat captain that supposedly sailed 60,000 miles or something to that effect. Wasn't part of that flat-earth argument based on the fact that such a lengthy voyage is what one would expect if the Earth was flat?

You're wrong, chair. I understand why you'd think this but I'm still convinced that you're wrong. Not every defense attorney thinks his client is innocent. Didn't you ever know anyone who was taking debate class and had to argue the side of an issue he disagreed with? If, on the outside...

Agreed

Well, I had "3rd grade" in there at first but then changed it. Maybe I over shot! :chuckle:

I don't mind study and I've watched way more video on flat earther stuff than I ever would have expected. One has his limits, however. So voice the objections and let's discuss it. REASONABLE objections to the globe earth model are not the same as affirmative arguments for a flat earth that...

It totally will determine it Dave. Think it through... If the latitude lines remain, as is the case on a disc shaped projection of the Earth then the North-South distances will remain accurate (i.e. consistent with distances measured in reality) but distances measured in any other direction...

Okay, I'll modify my position. If you want me to watch a video, you have to present in writing at least one of the pertinent arguments that respond to whatever argument I've made. If by doing so, you convince me that the video isn't a waste of time, then I'll watch it. I don't think you...

I promise to never watch another flat earth video so long as this thread is active. They are ALL wastes of time and just come off as laziness to even post them. If you want to debate this then you are going to have to debate it. I'm not debating YouTube anymore - period.

DAVID! I'm sick to death of the freakin' videos! Just explain it for crying out loud!

Dave, Australia is not 5500 miles across as it would have to be if the flat earth map was even close to being accurate. The distortion problems with map projections go away if the Earth is flat!

It seems that the U.N and NASA are the modern day guardians of the conspiracy to prevent the flatness of the Earth from getting out. Neither of those organizations are even a hundred years old yet. Who guarded the conspiracy before the U.N. and NASA? And just how would the U.N prevent someone...

Don't say stupid things. Dave's been totally honest and up front with what he's been doing from the beginning.

That's exactly what he was saying! What else could he have been saying? He was basically saying, "Look at those shadows of the clouds falling straight away from the light source that is causing them! Now, watch this! The shadow made by this piece of cardboard falls straight away from the light...

I'm sorry to be so insulting in some of my responses to these videos. Just understand that it isn't aimed at you. I just cannot get my head around that fact there are people who think that these arguments pass for clear thinking. It offends me as an insult to my inteligence. How can anyone find...

This feels like video 1000 that is 100% stupidity! The corpuscular rays do not in any way whatsoever contradict the notion that the Sun is far away. The guy in the video casts a shadow of a six in diameter piece of cardboard with holes in it and says "See! The rays don't splay out!" The...

Also JR, There is no need to suppose that the mountains we see today were even there when the Flood happened. The same event that caused the Flood could also have created the mountains thus removing the need for 30,000 ft deep waters. The Hydroplate Theory