Search results

You had me right up until "China takes Taiwan." Over my dead body!

OK. 🤷‍♂️

I'm not here to argue, especially with the likes of you. Oh. That's the reason, is it? You know what it is, therefore that is not it. You know, it took me a few goes to parse your opening sentence. This one — I'm not even going to try.

What? What argument? You don't know what "right" means.

See? You think Stacy Abrahams and Hilary Clinton are "far right." You have no idea what simple words mean.

1. You have no idea what the far right is. 2. You can't name a single incident even remotely similar to this nonsense done in the name of what is right and good.

Houston or LAX?

What?

Also, it's important to remember that half lives aren't reality. They're a mathematical model, which can never account for all of the things that affect elements.

Granite.

That's not gneiss.

And yet the US government declared an emergency and other international bodies likewise attempted to create a panic. That was until it became common knowledge that only homos and people — including kids — and animals that homos were abusing caught it. Homo diseases don't scare normal people.

So, nothing then. Just another lame attempt at emotional manipulation.

Thank you, link man.

That's insane

Wait. What did Pastor Enyart say about me?

I can't even... I don't live in the US. I'm not American. I've spent about 4 hours total in the country in airports. I don't care who you elect. Heck. I don't even care who they elect here. I haven't voted since the 1990s. Are you just now figuring these things out? How long have you been...

It looks like you don't know what that Latin phrase means. Let's write it with the main items switched: "You blokes argue Republican v Democrat like it's good v evil." That puts "Republican" with "good," if it is assumed that the sentence is presented respectively. Otherwise, it means...

You blokes argue Democrat v Republican like it's good v evil.

You really shouldn't use that word.