Search results

Romans 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who [d]suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because what may be known of God is [e]manifest [f]in them, for God has shown it to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His...

I don't believe a word that you say but even if these numbers are true, which I highly doubt, it's because we do not properly punish criminals in this country.

Why would it be okay to murder someone because their father was a rapist?

I am not responsible for what you read into my comments. Silly ridiculous nonsensical stupidity. A very very small number that's not even worth mentioning, just as is the number of husbands who rape their wives. Exceptions typically prove the rule, not the other way around. If you cannot...

To say the least. Rape is about violating someone in a way that is more profound than mere physical force. It is a violation that cannot be corrected or made amends for. It tears at not only the victim but at the very fabric of society itself. The death penalty for the convicted rapist is justice.

Even that were true, which I do NOT concede, it wouldn't change the fact that rape has nothing to do with reproduction, which is why I've said repeatedly that all this nonsense you're talking about is irrelevant. The rapist isn't trying to start a family. He isn't trying to extend his liniage...

I've never made any such claim.

Most of this is irrelevant to the topic but the study you cite doesn't support your contention, at least not in any direct way. Even the stat you directly site demonstrates that you are not talking about the same thing. Having sex for a year, three times a week would be 156 times. If one of...

Blah blah blah. Studies have shown that pregnancy results from rape about 5% of the time and most of the rapes that do result in pregnancy were perpetrated by members of the victim's own family. That's just the facts of reality. No it isn't. Rapists aren't trying to have children when they...

Saying it doesn't make it so. Biblically, life is the standard of right and wrong. Proverbs 11:19 As righteousness leads to life, So he who pursues evil pursues it to his own death. If you want to say that God is the standard then I can live with that too. It's the same thing. God is life...

The Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil grew to be enormous. So large that it stop the river that flowed out from Eden and split into the four head waters that watered the whole Earth. There was, therefore, a great drought and people went up stream to investigate the lack of water flow from the...

a.k.a. Natural Law

No it doesn't. That is, there isn't any reason to think that the Earth would have ever flooded the way it did without God intervening to either cause or allow it to happen. Who cares what Calvinists might say? They see no reason for their doctrine to make sense so they can say they believe...

Who says that it was what breached the crust? It escaped once the crust was breached but that doesn't mean that it had to be the mechanism that breached it.

Why would you doubt that it would be super heated? Water boils at sea level at just over 200°. That might seem hot but it really isn't very hot at all. Any hold of water at significant depth could easily be hundreds of degrees hotter than that. It wouldn't have to be super-heated in every...

It wouldn't need to build up. If the water were contained under a layer of the Earth's surface then it would be under pressure due to the weight of the earth above it. So long as the Earth was stable, so would the pressure be. To start the flood, all God had to do was uncork the bottle sort of...

I went back a reread your post. I misread it the first time. I, for some reason, took it to mean you didn't necessarily think that the flood actually happened. That isn't what you said so I don't know why I would have thought that.

I completely agree. There was a study in 1996, if I remember the year correctly, that showed pregnancy occurs due to rape only about 5% of the time which is only just barely considered statistically significant. Meaning that the percent of error in practically any scientific study is larger than...

Playing with fire there. It'll burn you one day. Rejecting Genesis as history has logical consequences that you won't like. You're only inches away from theistic evolution and from there the denial that Jesus was the Creator. Sounds like hyperbole but it isn't, I promise. It's best to put your...

Read my entire post before beginning to respond. It'll help keep you from look this idiotic. If you attribute human activity to ducks then you are, by definition, anthropomorphizing ducts. Accusing ducks of rape is, therefore, an anthropomorphism. No. Ducks do not talk and they only sort of...