Search results

Yet he talks about sacrificing, which is, what priests do.

That's exactly the kind of problem the courts would need to solve, by asking, what right or rights are involved here? The courts are where we sift the facts from the fiction. Don't buy it when they talk about 'science' in these terms. Science is what's political. The courts are legitimately...

I can't see videos on TOL, but here's what happened to this Calvinist when he became consistent in his Calvinism: He became Catholic.

What a mess! Sad.

Nope. The word 'everlasting' doesn't allow for any kind of 'pausing', that is why it's syntactically false to suggest that anything 'everlasting' would ever be 'put on hold'. It's either possible to put something 'on hold' or it isn't, and if it is, then it cannot be 'everlasting'. True...

By basing their rulings on the right judicial or legal theory. Namely, a rights-based theory.

Hypothetically, if you were to come to Mass, here is what you will see and an explanation. First of all remember that Catholics are all priests, and we are coming to Mass to celebrate our liturgy together. Liturgy is work; priestly work, and while we are all priests equally (Galations 3:28)...

A very weighty judicial theory you have there.

Addressed in OP. It's syntactically false.

Pope Saint John Paul II, pray for us! :)

I am. Hebrews 13:20 calls it an "everlasting covenant." Christ is our passover. We keep the feast.

Don't forget the Passover!

President Trump wisely tried to get all our allies to pitch in so that the price might be lower. Consider Taiwan. If China ever invaded, we'd have to drop everything and come to Taiwan's assistance. Could you imagine being a fly in the room where the president or joint chiefs or whoever is...

Don't forget the Sabbath!

Cheerleading rhetoric but DOA argument, it'll never convince gun controlling paternalists that their holy mission to remove guns from the private citizens is wrong. They'll all say, 'Oh yeah that's awful we should fix that' and keep on voting with Feinstein and Schumer all the while.

Huh. Never thought of that!

Oh.

Are you joking right now? Because on the first page literally JR, Clete and then even you yourself in post 12 said so. That's a terrific example of an 'everlasting covenant' that has not been 'put on hold'. So at least we all are on the same page about what that looks like.

What a terrible situation. It's the Taliban who have the blood on their hands though.

We have bigger fish to fry, which is unfortunate for the people of Afghanistan. Pakistan was harboring the Taliban, wouldn't cooperate with us, and we couldn't afford to invade them just to stamp out the Taliban, not with Russia and China in the world.