Search results

The host. If you don't like that, "the cracker". It's not a, "wafer", as wafers dissolve in your mouth. The host requires real mastication in order to safely swallow. The host is definitely bread, in the way a cracker is bread. And matzo.

Where are these teachings found? Where can we see what they are?

Victims of paedophiles are the victims of violent criminals.

That just means they support masturbation rights, and they believe they are equal rights for all. Paedophiles are violent criminals who commit violent crimes against children. If you have met a pedophile, you have met a violent criminal. Rape is a violent crime.

Our Church not only doesn't perform them, we don't bless same-sex marriages either. We don't wish them well; if they fail and end, we aren't overly troubled about it.

The Second Amendment does not indicate or imply any limit on what constitutes bearable arms. Courts traditionally here reason, that it doesn't protect the keeping and bearing of dangerous-and-unusual weapons (not the same as unusually dangerous).

I know it's serious enough that suicide is twice as deadly for Americans as murder is. I know that Black young men so greatly disproportionately skew our national data, that due to them only, our murder rate is double what it would otherwise be, and Blacks are only 13% of our population. And...

Ours are for similar reasons, like anybody who's going to do absolutely anything with any children, they get a background check, big time. At least annually they are rechecked! Securing our moral rights. aka human rights. I should hope so. So it comes down to, what's your moral theory...

It was. Glad to see you owning your obsession! Pedophiles are violent criminals. "...rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer." The wrongdoer is a violent criminal. "the sword" is for them. "the sword" is for...

Paedophiles are violent criminals. You have six threads on this. lol.

You have crim checks in your country, you've said. I'm asking you what they're for in your country. As far as I can see, it doesn't stop the behaviors we'd like to stop. Great, now go back to your dictionary and see what it says "bearing arms" means, because that's the term we're actually...

You didn't take your turn. What other things in 1791 were considered arms, besides guns of all sorts? It's still your turn.

What's it for where you live? Bearing arms is being armed. You can be armed with what's in your hand, strapped around your shoulder, in your backpack, in your car, mounted on your porch, towed by your tractor, all the ways to be armed is what bearing arms means. Taking up arms is synonymous...

Because tell me, please, what arms meant in 1789-1791. I want examples, of arms, in 1791, in America. All examples will be considered. I'll start: guns, of all types. Your turn.

You've missed where it's a violent crime. Plenty of homosexuals are not violent criminals, but these paedophile men are violent criminals. Whether they preferred one sex or the other is a separate thing, and unrelated to them being violent criminals, who target children with their violent crime.

The right to self-defense, like the right against being murdered, raped, falsely imprisoned, is absolute. Crim check. That's what I used to think until it was pointed out to me by @ok doser that civilians uncontroversially owned battleships earlier on in our history. They could have laid...

Not quite apples and oranges, but close. One is a question of quantity, and the other is a question of quality. Machine guns, just like all the other guns, do not cause murderers to murder. Nothing causes murder except murderers. Arms means guns. Arms meant guns. All manner of them too...

He should have had a background check. Some guns are so big you have to mount them on a trailer and tow them around. Others have to be carried by tanks, or helicopters, or jet airplanes. Plus it's just an objective fact: You never know when you'll need a belt-fed machine gun. Convicts have...

For me as a Catholic, this is my thought on the paedophilia The Catholic priesthood used to be a good place for a pedophile violent criminal absolutely immoral man to hide out, and avoid justice. If there were criminal naïveté, then the other priests were guilty of that, but criminal naivete...

This "ignorance" you accuse me of @Arthur Brain . . . what exactly is it? What is it that I do not know? Set it out. You're just bluffing. I call.