Search results

Doesn't matter. You've rejected ANY discussion with men and women smarter than your mere 60k. In the end, it is literally that odd little Australian, wholly audacious number that is entirely of 'no substance whatsover.' Go ahead and keep posturing, Trevor. I personally see it as...

1) is it appropriate to characterize a question so? 2) his post was addressing 'if' it were a Bible quote? Wouldn't all you would have needed, was to post the quoted 'scripture' verbatim? 🤔 3) Try not to be so easily offended? I'd think a Catholic 'could' have asked the same question...

Trevor, Trevor, Trevor. Posturing without listening gets you nothing. You can go your happily, chosen, ignorant way. The rest of the millions and millions (hundreds of them) KNOW what you don't. You really think God came to an oddball little group and told only you something different...

To the incredibly small ignorance of scriptures already given. Your ignorance is showing: "Manfaced" Wish you weren't stuck in English arrogance and subpar translation.... :sigh: You literally have to follow whoever is the smarter guru, having no such education and background. It is a...

Problems with Christadelphians (a little primer on this oddity of the cult world): 1) There aren't even 100k of them :noway: There aren't even 70k of them! 2) Jesus came back in 1866 and the RC was destroyed (yeah, didn't happen). 3) Like many cults, these deny a need for a Savior. The Lord...

Er, no. That is derivative, deductive theology (and denomination). You will never, ever (period) find "Jesus, son of Adam." 1 Corinthians 15:47 Sadly, you Christadelphians don't know your Bible, JUST what you want to believe. How many times have you read through your Bible, Trevor? Even...

I think so too, seems to be 'which wave' and season we happen to be talking about 🤔

Good thought/reasoning. One of the arguments goes: It is its own evidence: It'd not be in the Bible if it weren't for Apostleship. The assumption then is: Who was 'most' qualified to write such a letter as Hebrews? While this has always gone back and forth and with incredibly good...

Good thoughts and study here. There are some reasons for thinking it 'was' Paul. Note that at the end of the article, it concurs, however, with you, against Pauline authorship using Hebrews 2:3 as sufficient evidence. To me, the 'need' isn't there to determine authorship. The book is...

You are deluded. I've shown you, repeatedly, its deficits and mistruths as well as YOUR proclivity to build/buy a god in your OWN image. YOU found something YOU liked and slapped 'god' haphazardly on a poor-excuse-for-a-wagon. The UB is every bit the flawed contrivance of Joseph Smith et al...

The compound word is 'union' (sun-'soon') and Lord (kurio). Literally, then not 'chance' but more akin to 'by union with the Lord' or 'by the Lord's will.'

Not sure Luke is chance. It says 'if' a condition, and then the result, unequivocally "if" He is correct (it is a verse in favor of Divine Foreknowledge).

Seems to just be a trend?

mik-reh' From H7136; something met with, that is, an accident or fortune: - something befallen, befalleth, chance, event, hap (-peneth). 🤔

🤔 Hebrews 9:27 "It is appointed Once for man to die, then the judgement."

Well, that is true too, but they aren't going to come into the theology section to discuss it? 🤔 I think these are usually posted "And the Rest" and sometimes politics. The first thing they will argue about is a 'cell.' they don't believe life started with a cell, but the basic...

True. Read that link. It substantiates all of my concerns as viable. In addition, the last 4 people (nurses doctors) I talked to said they are holding off for now. From what I'm reading, in Chicago, if doctors or nurses hold off, they are being suspended. To me? Seems politics are...

Again, does 'the shot' stop someone else from getting it 'from' me if I'm exposed? I am reading more reports that say "93%" but it doesn't tell me (clearly) if I come in contact with it, though it may only be mild for me, am I actually safe to be around other people? (From what I'm hearing...

But that was my question: Is it an actual vaccination, or just an insistence on one particular remedy (like insisting on NyQuil or vitamin D injections)? The current remedies are just brand names and bandaids, like nasal spray or zinc. At least that is the way doctors trying to help me be...

Problem: It is a surmised assumption based on the line of reasoning that also assumes a truth. It isn't really engaging truth (of scripture) but sidestepping it to embrace an assumption. In this case "pagan" enters as a pejorative (much like "Greeks"). It next assumes that logic and...