Search results

And I didn't explain already but as the thread shows, I was responding to a post that I made, where I said the president won the popular vote, which I meant as winning a majority, and so I answered my own post and clarified that he didn't win a majority. I meant 'the popular vote' to mean the...

The problem isn't faggots, it's faggotism, which is the ideology that wants to faggotize everything. So far, faggotism has made tremendous, epic inroads to Western Culture (with the exception of basically Japan). There are faggots who aren't faggotists. Most faggotists, by a wide margin, are...

Most of us wonder what you are thinking. Nobody who's under a spell fully chose to be under the spell, they just didn't know what they were getting into. There are some who appear to be under a spell but who are actually just grifters, I don't think you're a grifter. I think you believe in...

? Are you drunk and on drugs?

Why'd you ask if you didn't want to know?

Actually you said that I was "sitting pompously in judgement over those not in such good fortune", so you're trying to twist this, which is disappointing, toward it only being about the word "pompous", but that's really not the issue, it's the "judgment" part that I'm saying didn't happen.

It's an ideology which in America began under the guise of first wave feminism, and has since sprouted and blossomed into homosexuals marrying and acquiring children and men becoming women. Oh and ofc ubiquitous smut. And all kinds of other terrible, un-Christian things. That are a pestilence...

ofc you are. You accused me of "sitting pompously in judgement over those not in such good fortune", turns out that didn't happen, and so now you're "bored". Sure thing.

It's a shame that faggotism is so popular Arthur.

Just to remind everybody the topic: Carry on Arthur!!!

I've had a change of heart.

How aren't they both equally deceitful.

“ I read this article by @AnthonyEsolen in college (late 2000s) and it changed my life. “ “A Requiem for Friendship: Why Boys Will Not Be Boys & Other Consequences of the Sexual Revolution” “ Esolen, in his usually brilliant manner, showed how in the past, red lines on sexual...

Yes he won a plurality. Not a majority.

That's a distraction. It's the smut. 999,999 times out of a million, it's legal smut. And that's the problem. There's also underage smut. The smut is the problem. There're also other problems, but the common denominator is smut.

I like how he's obv reading. He didn't learn his lines, and he doesn't care:

Nope. Nobody said the scars were faked or manufactured, nothing like that was suggested or implied or alluded to or said. I said "there is obv ... some sort of mapping to His old body in His new body". What has been said is all in accord with that, our new bodies, will be able to change our...

A creature that cannot see what's right in front of its own nose.

I believe I answered this here: "there is obv ... some sort of mapping to His old body in His new body" It was analogical, you're taking it too literally. I meant that it appears plausible that He had the ability to alter his appearance to others. Sure.