Search results

You really know how to hurt a guy.

New York Times & Wall Street Journal, in no order, are the gold standards in America for news. One's Democrat and one's Republican, basically.

Just a survey of introductory college level textbooks is sufficient to establish what an entire discipline's authentic experts think on any matter, you can at least see where there is uniformity and where the field is 'split'. Wherever they're in uniform agreement you can appeal to that...

The good thing that can come out of this assuming we don't plunge into WWIII is how battered Russia's economy is in all this. There's no way that China hasn't had to rethink whatever they might have been thinking about Taiwan and general belligerence. We could destroy China's economy just as...

And yet it's here mentioned right in John chapter one. Curious, that.

Strange indeed since I quoted John chapter one. Almost like, John's audience already knew about grace! 'DBR' = grace.

Red herring, this having NOTHING TO DO with what I wrote, in direct response to what you wrote.

So untrue. All of the Republicans who are Putin apologists are right here on TOL. There aren't very many of them, iow. If there's one thing we know about how effective Russian interference in American democracy was it's that it was 100% failure. We are a clear super majority right now...

John 1:17 " For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ."

"Too heavenly minded to be of any earthly good" And 'heavenly minded' there is a false heavenly minded-ness Hoping. Real heavenly minded-ness is Colossians chapter three, the whole thing. Go back to Mass, your home.

And we know where grace came from, right in John chapter one (written to the circumcision, according to MAD). John 1:17 " For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ." And things that are the same are not different.

'DBR' to both, as Christ indeed taught them on earth during His ministry to the circumcision, the 'DBR', which has been shown here in this thread.

So there's no law then?

So the old OT law is just changed now?

It's one way to 'skin the cat' of needing to have one world government is all. Maybe you prefer to make a brand new constitution for such a future political situation, I'm all ears.

You can't go full electric without nuclear. It's another reason for one world government.

Not me. I seek to expand America to swallow up all the other countries as more states of the Union.

Yes. What does "love" mean, as a law? How do we know whether we are obeying the law of love? Bearing in mind Hebrews 7 which says there's a new law now, not the OT law.

That's why I said I got your meaning, it was just a detail. What the US was able to do was impose a moral ideology upon Japan and Germany, and that ideological 'crash course' has been shown to be durable. As you note, their culture wasn't changed, just their morals. They both were under great...

And this doesn't address what I asked at all. It's dodging. You're trying to change the subject. What "limit" (your word) is there to the putatively absolute human right against being raped? We'll wait ... for an eternity. Well of course you hope that.