Search results

I mean yes, in times of emergency, in times of stress (exigency but not just expediency), being so unforgiving is, or can be justified anyway. But I don't think the Church is right now, or was recently, even going back to the lead up to the Reformation, in such a situation, so if we find that...

Yep. Whatever you have to do differently when you're walking, whether it's a limp, a new order in which the different parts of your foot falls, 'squatting' a little bit every step (something I've done a number of times during my 30-minute walks), walking backwards, or some other new technique...

I offered up a theory. Are you denying that it is a breech of justice if a contract is enforced upon a party with exculpatory evidence that they did not enter into the contract with informed consent? Like for instance with coercion like holding your loved ones hostage? Or threatening your...

Yep. Still walk though. And that's the complementarity between them. Walk to heal and recover----lift to make walking easier. Walking is necessary, and it can't hurt (you can't allow walking to hurt), which would be aggravating the injury. So you have to 'walk funny' in order to walk for 30...

Right. So if there's any confirmation of that, then I could begin to understand CRT. But as things stand I can't find a single 'canonical' reference of what CRT is. Whatever you accuse CRT of being is always denied, and you're never told what it is, only just what it isn't.

OK, how? What is your conceptualization of what that looks like? Because you can serve no 'outward' master and still serve the 'inner' master of your dopamine system. Wouldn't you say that crack and meth addicts are serving their dopamine systems? They may serve no other masters but they are...

If I could just ascertain any single elemental proposition made by CRT then I could begin to attempt to understand what it is.

It stands, against @Skeeter but not against me. As it actually literally stands right now it's against me, because it's against my post. Thanks.

. . . within discrete philosophies of morality, law. Judicial philosophies and moral theories differ and conflict. What an absolute monarchist ideology thinks should be done conflicts with liberalism. For one it's true for the other it's false. But even that all aside, you haven't nullified...

@1Mind1Spirit you can talk about flat earth if you want to. "I'm your huckleberry" :)

Looks like they're going to settle on the Donbas? Perhaps that was the goal all along, we have no idea because they've been caught lying through their stupid Russian teeth so many times, in the past like 60 days.

"I can't believe how sore I am", I'm thinking, but I don't really believe it. It's a kneejerk thing to say. I believe how sore I am, it's just that I'm so sore the "I can't believe how sore I am" is just automatic. Here are the parts of my body which are sore. I tried to remember as I walked...

@Heterodoxical This old thread's about (don't click the link before reading on because I'm quoting a post that's on page four of the thread, not page one) a troll of some sort who wants to ask if there's any reason to not convert to Catholicism. The notable thing for me is this user's...

Mr. Tobias Forge doesn't have an original thought in his head. On this latest record he's got a song strongly reminiscent of Metallica and another song that's almost exactly Tool's "Jambi". But neither did Aristotle or Aquinas have original thoughts in their heads, and those men shaped an age...

He is. See below. None of that changes a single thing I said.

Actually God's Word is anything in the Apostolically approved Christian Bible (73 books) plus anything the Apostles themselves taught in word or in deed that was received, preserved and transmitted by bishops, outside of the Scripture. So God's Word's in the Catechism too. Sorry for your...

You need to reread that post. It was not directed to you.

Right. I'm pretty sure but I could be wrong that @ok doser was not thinking about that definition. The thread was about whether "marital rape" was permissible (or possible) according to the Bible, not common law.

OK. Well, the crucifix, the cross with the corpus. And don't forget the Holy Spirit's dove representation, plus there's usually another statue of Jesus somewhere or another crucifix, and statues of Mary, Joseph, and then there are regional statuary and art too. We don't really represent the...

Let me put it this way. If Mrs. Clinton ever uttered anything like the following in her campaign in 2016 she would have beat President Trump in that election, but she didn't. "It's not like I'm Joe Biden. It's not like I'm not going to by accident get us into WWIII." People especially in the...