Search results

Yes He did, never said or implied otherwise, not even a little, not even once. Straw man. Bald assertion. We reap what we sow, it's self-evident. If you sin, there are consequences, punishments, penalties, in this life, it's self-evident, even you'd have to agree. You commit adultery...

idk but this might be a rare picture of a rare rock formation, in a mountain. Maybe 'as a mountain'. Maybe the whole mountain is the whole, possibly rare rock formation itself, I don't know I figure I'm between 0.1-0.25 level geology. But it made me think about the "rug" or carpet that gets...

You need rhetoric, because you're trying to persuade, but first we need to persuade ourselves. What is your feedback to the idea that the dinosaurs were like today's crocodiles and alligators, and spent most of their time in and around the water? And that they were not included in Noah's...

Being better at rhetoric than everybody else doesn't make you right. They're distinct. President Trump, President Bush 43, President Reagan and President Kennedy were all superlative rhetoricians, but it doesn't make them always right, they're just gifted, talented and skillful rhetoricians.

Maybe this is a way out for everybody. Maybe this is a chip we can negotiate with. Maybe we say, "Get the ... get out of Ukraine, and we'll deny Finland's NATO application." Finland's going to make it official real soon. So it will become any day now real. Tell Putin the Putatively...

Like I said. I agree with what Doser said.

Though, that's likely how Flood deniers feel about us too.

I know. And they all knew that too. That's why they formulated the legislation the way they did. They're on our side.

Dude. smh

Again, trace the etiology here. Pandemic, President Trump loses his electioneering balance (skillfully) dealing with it, and then his reelection chances went from wind-in-his-sails, to a loss. This whole 2020 election controversy never happens, January 6th never happens, if there's no...

I try to follow your links @ffreeloader but I think to myself, before I go looking at something on, quote-unquote "odysee.com" I'm going to check the Democrats' New York Times, and the Republicans' Wall Street Journal, and then something foreign like Financial Times, or something non-partisan...

No I wouldn't call it encourage, no. I would call it perhaps . . . a loophole? It's like an Easter egg. It's like when you study some riddle and you finally figure it out. Your view is, I've heard it referred to as, "scrupulosity". In Catholic land, that's what your view is called...

Federal. Let's say someone's arrested for a crime, is it Constitutional to provide him with government-subsidized legal representation? Is it Constitutional for the federal government to provide this government service, to this arrested person? Free legal care? I know the answer.

Show me the explicit or interpreted limitation on provision of government services like curbside litter collection, schools, road building and maintenance, etc.?

It doesn't forbid it either.

lol you really know how to hurt a guy RD

Yeah there's nothing un-Constitutional about providing more government services. In fact the most important government service we provide is our government itself! Without this we'd be in a perpetual state of war. And second in line is our glorious military. Our troops defend not only our...

'Told you.

Meanwhile, someone's lighting up right in front of a powder keg https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-putin-kyiv-western-europe-4e2a185188fa94200161b831d6692683 Putin is a Fool of Biblical Proportions.

No, all the Republican legislators knew this, so they imposed strict accounting rules so that what you're saying happens doesn't happen.