Search results

I think I can see them now from my home. How long is that?

In other news Russia's IN Ukraine rn. 'You (or the VP) think any 18-year-olds in Ukraine should be able to buy a weapon of war rn? No answer? Non-responsive? Not surprising. (Not that the AR15 is actually a weapon of war anyway; it being rather a reduced functionality replica of an M16...

It's like a cutaway museum exhibit: Sign: What's inside those trailer truck tires? Surprise! Nothing!

I'm keeping my fingers crossed for looming Second Amendment SCOTUS rulings, and relatedly, for Repubs to regain WH and Senate. Defend and add to that "Originalist" 6-to-3 edge on the Court.

The silence means they approve of the direction their party's heading in, even though they're not exactly sure how to support gun control theoretically or philosophically, apart from a simplistic and immoral absolute majoritarianism, which they all know at base is wrong.

Must have been like how people in Ukraine are living 100% all their lives nowadays.

We do know that objectively this upcoming November election is far more important than literally whatever happened on January 6th, right? OK good.

Hmm. ...

If they're raised right I agree with you, but if they're raised wrong (through no fault of their own), then I think it is possible. I mean raised wrong like, they had horrific parents. That's not their fault, but they can still I think provide informed consent to a murder, if and only if they...

We must be mindful too of the notion of in persona Christi. Whenever anyone, even if they're not a believer, baptizes anyone else, in the name of the Trinity, they validly baptize in persona Christi. This is what the Apostles taught, and we know this for certain, because it's what all the...

Mass is Mass.

An internet rando said so!

Also true.

Do you have a point.

Even though the devil we know is a devil, we know this devil. This devil is less likely to surprise us, because we know this devil. Maybe the successor won't be a devil at all, but maybe he will be. And if he is, maybe he won't be as bad a devil, or maybe he'd be the same bad, and maybe he'd...

You're kidding.

Ugh. So your answer is yes, I should take "this guy's" personal interpretation over the Supreme Court's de facto Constitutional interpretation. The Supreme Court's ruling is that the prefatory clause basically doesn't matter when interpreting the operative clause.

Arthur, you have no idea about that. That's unsubstantiated. There easily could be a more evil man in his organization. I mean, you know the story of Stalin right? We thought Lenin was bad. We had no idea.

Same way Mass helps anyone with power, transportation, Police 911, running water, and unlimited food. We hear Christ speak His Word and Gospel, and we are in His Real Presence, and, for those of us blessed and lucky enough to be in full communion, we can also boldly receive His body, blood...

And so this man's interpretation I should be taking over the Supreme Court's interpretation, is what you're telling us? Be clear if that's what you mean. Yes or no.