Search results

Mostly peaceful.

lol.

Like I'm gonna talk to a troll. https://theologyonline.com/threads/dont-feed-the-trolls.59063/ lol

Amen. Our Constitution demands it. It's the only way it works.

@User Name (s?) fundamentally misunderstands the United States Constitution.

Boo!!!!

Bump

Pretty much except I'll push it further forward a few years, 1789, 1791, whenever the Constitution was ratified. The Articles of Confederation (the first American national regime) was a mistake. Good thing we corrected it too.

Thread title promised so much. OP delivered so little. Just another Democrat electioneering: Translation: If you're not a Democrat, you're not a patriot. Please.

Yes, you get it.

The right to due process, right. Also the right to vote. The right to an attorney. Yes. I understand. It's confusing. Some of these are like, political rights. What you and JR and RD are arguing about are human rights. Human rights are pre-political. They do not and cannot change due to...

Rights don't impose positive obligations on other people, only negative ones. That's the difference. It's totally fine morally to democratically decide to provide subsidized social welfare in whatever proportion a polity wishes. That doesn't mean rights are decided democratically; they are...

You're a little "scrupulous", ask Anna what it means, she "has me on ignore". She doesn't "get" analogies, but she understands what scrupulosity is, I'm just saying you're analogous to being a little scrupulous, politically. You get Roe overturned but you count it as anything but a huge moral...

https://theologyonline.com/threads/abortion-cont.33667/ @Town Heretic argues against abortion rights based there being a preponderance of evidence that we cannot objectively know when on the timeline, between conception on one side and birth on the other, that the baby's right to life comes...

Not possible in my rendition. We annex currently sovereign nations (all 13 of the original states were sovereign nations) and they submit to the Constitution. Just like all 50 states do already today.

Seventh Day Adventist.

MAD can only exist in a world with multiple independent, sovereign nations. We should all surrender our sovereignty, which we selfishly and dangerously grasp desperately to, wrongly, mistakenly and illogically thinking that our best outcome cannot possibly proceed from unselfishly surrendering...

https://us.cnn.com/2022/07/02/asia/north-korea-japan-united-states-asian-nato-intl-hnk/index.html "Global NATO" might be our answer. Nobody ever wants to give up sovereignty, people fight wars over sovereignty, even if it is the least irrational option (see the Federalist papers for how hard...