Search results

Bit of a rabbit trail here.... The verse about Jesus being present when two or three are gathered together applies to Kingdom believers in the previous dispensation, who had a corporate relationship with God. We need no such group. If you are in Christ then Christ is present with you and in you...

That seems to be all these twits are capable of doing! Repeating themselves as though we've said nothing.

You are a flat out lying jerk! How much more context can be provided that the entire book of Jonah! And no, the source is not relevant. You are either lying or you're not! My opinion doesn't come into it. You are saying thing that no one who's mind works well enough to speak English could...

The source is irrelevant. I wasn't stating an opinion. You come here and intentional ignore every argument made against your position and then when you finally succeed in getting someone to write your off as the waste of time that you are, you desire to stand with your shoulders back and...

What could this passage possibly mean? :unsure: Colossians 2:11 In Him you were also circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the sins of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, 12 buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him...

The source is irrelevant. I wasn't stating an opinion. You come here and intentional ignore every argument made against your position and then when you finally succeed in getting someone to write your off as the waste of time that you are, you desire to stand with your shoulders back and...

Is it that everyone has simply decided to ignore everything I say. That's fine.

I just do not understand how you think this argument proves me wrong. Are you really arguing here that Adam and Eve and their children and all of the prophets and anyone else that God has spoken to over the centuries were all sinless people and who's relationship with God was all hunky dory...

You are a liar, Leatherneck! Live with that!

You are intentionally wasting my time. Good bye.

Yes, yes, there's all sorts of scriptures that Christians have turned into mindless cliches. Your premises: 1. God is immutable. 2. That which is immutable cannot die. So I ask you again... Are you saying then that Jesus is not God or are you denying that Jesus died? Based on YOUR OWN stated...

Walking and functioning both require sequence and duration. Therefore, "...walking out of time or functioning at all outside of it." is a contradiction. It's just irrational fantasy.

Genesis 1:14 is about the creation of clocks! God definitely created clocks and really good ones too, but definitely not time. Clocks and time are not the same thing any more than a ruler is the same thing as distance.

No, you wouldn't! That would be stupidity. Are you saying then that Jesus is not God or are you denying that Jesus died? Well, you certainly have all the Christian cliches down pat! How do you deal with I Kings 22:19-22 I Kings 22:19 Then Micaiah said, “Therefore hear the word of the Lord: I...

I already explained that? Do you actually read my posts or is this well and truly just a blatant waste of my time? Time is an idea, not an ontological thing that can be controled. God is quite fully capable of controlling any natural process or any other thing that is used as a clock but...

Was this an INTENTIONAL lie or are you stupid? No one could hardly be this stupid! I've explained how your two sentences worth of proof texts do not mean that God doesn't change IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER (i.e. in other words, your proof texts do NOT say that God is immutable - not in English and...

Repeating an argument, doesn't make the rebuttal go away, Leatherneck! Why don't you tell me why what I said in response to this point already can't be right? Do you have ANYTHING at all to say in response to the argument that have been made against your doctrine other than merely repeating...

No, I don't believe any of that but not for the incoherent reason you suggest. I believe what I believe because I take the bible to be literally true. I understand that God changes in important and dramatic and permanent ways because I don't turn any passages that explicitly teaches otherwise...

I believe what the bible teaches. I believe that God was capable of given Adam and Eve privacy. Why not? Do you believe that God is required to be a first person eye ball witness to every vile act that occurs in the back rooms of gay bars? I don't! The bible certainly doesn't teach that He has...

Good bye.