Search results

That question only makes sense to ask from within your own twisted paradigm. Any answer to that question would only ever serve as some sort of queer point in the mind of someone who has redefined practically every word in the English language to suit their false teaching. Does the drowning man...

I'll stop short of calling this a lie in the intentional sense of the word because this fool actually does believe this nonsense, but it is very definitely a false teaching. The fact that man has a free will is not only evident in every single moment of our lives but it is a concept found...

You read your doctrine into every passage you read and think you've presented a proof text! You are quite literally blinded by your own rhetoric. You won't even rationally discuss anything because you can't. You redefined every theological word of any importance to the point that you aren't even...

You read your doctrine into every passage you read and think you've presented a proof text! You are quite literally blinded by your own rhetoric. You won't even rationally discuss anything because you can't. You redefined every theological word of any importance to the point that you aren't even...

Unfalsifiable nonsense! When you're allowed to redefine words and to make up new terms that have whatever meaning you need them to have to fit your doctrine then the doctrine becomes unfalsifiable and therefore meaningless. For the Calvinist, it is even worse than that because the do not stop...

No it most certainly is not Paul's! That is advice! Terrific advice to be sure but Paul (i.e. God through Paul) is not giving us a new law! The previous verse says, "The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. And likewise the husband does not have authority over...

Translation: "No, I can't point to any post anywhere, on any thread at any time, where any such claim was made. How dumb of you to ask! Did you think I had actually read any of this thread?"

What I am reacting to is your contention that a spouse has no right to refuse sex which is completely asinine and leads to a situation where rape is not possible within a marriage.

Poppy cock! There is no such teaching in scripture. The verse you cite is general advice and it's good advice but it cannot be rightly used to construe such a law. There are as many different reasons for a wife to withdraw sexually as there are women who have done it. Some of those reasons are...

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something. I certainly hope that I am because it seems to me that he believes that God has created a situation where rape cannot occur within a marriage and that if anything similar to rape happens it's the fault of whichever spouse was the one saying "No!" because...

Prediction confirmed. There was never any chance whatsoever that any straight answer was forthcoming from B57 to a perfectly clear and simply question that any Calvinists couldn't possibly resist the need to complicate. The fact is that it doesn't depend on what I mean by call! Your own...

What you see or don't see is not relevant. The FACT is that there is nothing there that "expressly forbids" anything! Thank you for conceding the debate. Forbidding a spouse to withdraw consent would be a de-facto permission to rape, by definition. No it IS NOT!!! Good grief man! Listen to...

False premise. I Corinthians does not expressly forbid any such thing. The bible does not teach a defacto permission to rape one's wife! It is NOT the fault of the wife if the husband forces himself on her! This is perhaps the most foolishly evil position I've ever seen you take.

Beware of double talk! Calvinists love to give lip service to man's will but they don't really believe it exists. Watch this..... Here's a simply question that b57 almost certainly with not answer. At least, he won't answer directly, or, if he does, it'll be weeks from now or in another thread...

Incredibly, that is precisely what Calvinists in general and b57 in particular believes! "I admit that in this miserable condition wherein men are now bound, all of Adam's children have fallen by God's will... ...Nor ought it to seem absurd when I say, that God not only foresaw the fall of the...

No, I wrote it myself, last week. Well, it was last week for me. I have a time machine where I can go back do cool stuff like that.

I cor. 7 does not canonize new law. It's advice. Denying one's spouse without cause is foolish and will have undesirable consequences but it is not expressly forbidden. If someone is denying their spouse long term and without cause, it would be grounds for divorce, not rape.

Yes.

Any who would seriously entertain the question, "Does a husband have the right to rape his wife?" is at a level of stupity rivaled only by the moron who asked the question! By idiots who wouldn't know what justice looked like if it walked up and gave then the slap across the face that they...

I ask again... Why would it be okay to MURDER someone because their father was a rapist?