Search results

Science grifters. Love it. But you did not supply any "facts or logical doubts" so a bit hard to evaluate

Ah, are you unaware of the magnetic striping? It impacts sea floor spreading which you claimed did not exist. See post # 26

How do you explain the magnetic striping on either side of the mid Atlantic ridge?

You brought it up . Ball is in your court.

How do you know that? What evidence do you have?

Well, pick a particular fact ans we can discuss. Your choice.

Oh sorry, was not meant as an insult at all. I think you need some mental help and I hope you get it

And your opinion makes me question your thought processes

Uh, no. The Hydro-Plate Theory is funnier than plate tectonics--about the only thing it has going for it. How many H-bombs worth of energy does it take in what period of time to make it work?

Have a nice life

Crichton said that in a speech at Cal Tech in 2003. He was a climate change skeptic and was bemoaning the consensus then developing around climate change. I think this was not long after Mann's hockey stick graph became well known. But Crichton overstated his complaint re science consensus. He...

Yes, that is what the Bible says.

Well, no. I asked a couple of specific questions and you did not answer them. OK if You don't want to do so.

And after you have read Walt brown investigate the RATE Project. For A summary Google American Scientific Affiliation analysis of the RATE project.

And you did not answer the questions I posed.

Of course it does. Do you question the fact the earth revolves around the sun? Germ theory vs miasma? That DNA is transcribed/translated to RNA and that is how proteins are made in cells? Aren't each of those examples part of generally accepted mainstream science?

Well, the entire basis of science is skepticism so there is always the possibility that a particular bit of science would not be accurate. That's the reason science changes on occasion---we got past the miasma theory of disease for example when scientists started to understand and formulate the...

Why is that question a logical fallacy? It is not an argument, just a question based on Clete's earlier comment.

I suspect you are wrong on both counts. Unless of course you read the recent decision and can support your claims with specific language from the decision. Just make sure you are aware of the cases cited in the decision with concurrances by Kavanaugh and Gorsuch and a dissent by St. Antonin that...