Search results

How do you reconcile a 4th day of the week crucifixion with Luke 24:21?

So, you're saying that it was the 15th when the disciples asked the Messiah where He would like for them to prepare the Passover?

Rebel for truth, You have a question directed to you in post #36.

Any thoughts about what the perishing might consist of?

How do you reconcile that with Luke 24:21?

It wasn't. See the first paragraph of the OP.

I don't see where your link is applicable to this topic. What do you have in mind?

Taking Matthew 28:1-10, Mark 16:1-10, Luke 24:1-12 and John 20:1-18 and using every verse from the above intermingle them into a single chronological list from the first event to the last. Some verses can be shown in tandem when they are referring to the same event at the same time. Perhaps...

Ok, I thought maybe I was missing something.

I'm confused. First you say that you agree with me and then you seem to be saying that you don't.

Any belief that you don't now have.

Yes.

What is stupid about it? I'm merely stating a fact - as of yet, no one has provided a demonstration of their ability to consciously engender a new belief in something.

That statement between your quote marks is true, but I don't see where I've said that. I think that in the immortal words of Struther Martin, "What we have here is a failure to communicate."

And yet so far no one has demonstrated such an ability in real time.

No problem.

So your state of mind when you realized the evidence was logically consistent would be that you still believed that "x" didn't exist, but you could go ahead and believe that it did exist and - poof - you would now believe that it did?

So the moment you knew that the evidence was logically consistent, what would your state of mind be with regard to a belief in the issue in question?

You wrote that you need convincing evidence. So again, how would you know when you had convincing evidence?

How would you know when you had convincing evidence?