Search results

And literally every single one of the things you mentioned just happens to support the Democratic party. And yet you and yours, all those here who refuse to take a side in Democrats against Republicans ("libertarians" I'm looking at you 😉), are just letting this happen. Republicans are...

I'll do you one better, I found a link with the full study. https://www.therapyequality.org/apareport/static/55efa8b5e4b0c21dd4f4d8ee/t/58b4de34be65947fa341bdf8/1488248372994/ContentServer%20(84).pdf "One of the more salient findings of this study is that 46% of homosexual men and 22% of...

Yes. Homosexuals were interviewed. The percentage of homosexuals who were basically raped when children is far higher, among both men and women, than non-homosexuals. It suggests and is consistent with but does not prove, that such exposure during youth can distort the normal development of...

Is it? Do you understand that my political ideology is basically Constitutional Originalism? And that it's based upon the idea that we have universal, inalienable rights? And that perhaps the one right which we all possess both individually and collectively, is the right to justice? Is this...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11501300/ This is science, and medicine. Not politics.

Undeniably he's a poor judge of character. But that's not crooked.

There's no problem in believing in six days as regards your science, unless your science is antagonistic toward logic. I hold to the literal, wooden view of Genesis, but I also can entertain ideas, without in any way compromising my position. The idea is only a proposition, a proposal. It...

He's not a crook.

I nEvEr argued that. Of course they are. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6026959/ 100% political and not 100% medical. Partially medical and completely political.

I'm pretty sure Arthur's is at least a four year old joke. ;)

Of course there is. What do you think it's genetic or something? Who said otherwise?

I don't. I used the "roll eyes" smilie.

This is really good news :rolleyes: Can anyone confirm?

You think Catholicism and Orthodoxy are "fundamental branches?" Didn't I say that pretty much all of us know that "curing" would require a miracle? How's that "out there?" That's pretty much what I said. Catholicism agrees. Depends what you mean by "expected."

Yes it would. It's impossible for it to be otherwise. We already have what the OP proposes in a small measure, and public defenders are not slaves, not even rhetorically. I promise you that having even middling legal representation will lead to more justice than having no legal...

No, that's impossible for it to be easier to do when everybody has a lawyer. We already are that. This thread is about public attorneys, provided to the public free of charge (subsidized from government revenue). That makes no sense. Lawyers are the experts in the law. You're saying we...

Saying it doesn't make it so. Is God literally, wooden, the Logos? Is He literally, wooden, love? Spirit? Evasive. The Logos, Love, Spirit. Literal, wooden; or figurative, allegory and or symbol? Time is assumed by all verbs, it's part of what makes a verb, grammatically. It presupposes...

Is there a ... white check mark now? How long has this been a thing? (Can you see where it says "Official?")

You mean a non-miraculous explanation

That's not bad. I always just thought, to the accusation that God's being dishonest, that surely it's more dishonest for Him to tell us it only took Him six days, when it actually took Him billions of years? That's got to be more dishonest than Him "making it look like everything's older than...