Search results

So what?

10 Trillion isn't 1% of what such a thing would actually cost. It's not even close to being possibly doable, never mind feasible, affordable or smart. Gates' preposterous solution is based on the same idiotic premise that the global warming hoax itself is based on. That premise being that we...

Is there ANY scripture that you do not twist to conform to your doctrine? How is it even possible for a someone to fail to detect it when they are so completely upside down and backward? Bringing a belief to the word of God and making His word somehow agree with whatever it is you've brought...

The vessel of wrath is what God made after He found that He was UNABLE to make a vessel of honor because of the recalcitrant nature of the clay. Jeremiah 18:1 The word which came to Jeremiah from the Lord, saying: 2 “Arise and go down to the potter’s house, and there I will cause you to hear...

Let's put you to the test! "Very simple" you said. "You just need a single clear instance of that exact word" you said... Exodus 35:29 The children of Israel brought a freewill offering to the Lord, all the men and women whose hearts were willing to bring material for all kinds of work which...

This is call moving the goal post. It's another dishonest tactic used by people who cannot defend their beliefs. What you have done however is defeat your own argument by presenting what would otherwise be known as a argument from definition. The definition of gravity is (roughly) the...

This nonsense amounts to a lie. This isn't just poor thinking, this isn't just a fallacy of logic. It is an intentional, purposeful dodge of the plain reading of scripture. The bible never uses the word gravity. Do you deny its existence as well? There was no bluster! I simply and directly...

It opens fine. I was wondering why I can't get the channel on my cable TV (Comcast).

Who says? You? My bible is replete with free will from beginning to end! Here's just three of the more obvious examples.... See, I set before you today life and prosperity, death and destruction. For I command you today to love the Lord your God, to walk in his ways…then you will live and...

Why don't I get Sky News here in Houston?

By "explained" B57 means that he's boldly stated the claim that his INTERPRETATION of the bible is the correct one.

Paul put it best when he stated the following... Roman 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. 20 For...

People deny it all day every day.

This stupidity not only flies in the face of scripture, plain reason and common sense but stands in open opposition to the every day lives and very conversion experience that those who believe it claim to have had themselves! They believe this so called "myth" looks and feels EXACTLY like the...

It is, in fact, comforting to know that Calvinists have no argument to make in support of their hideous doctrine. It's nothing but unsupported claims with no substance whatsoever. That is perhaps the only good that you accomplish here. You serve to demonstrate the vapid nature of Calvinism.

Not according to Calvinism... “The devil, and the whole train of the ungodly, are in all directions, held in by the hand of God as with a bridle, so that they can neither conceive any mischief, nor plan what they have conceived, nor how muchsoever they may have planned, move a single finger...

You're correct, it is definitely an appeal to the stone fallacy but that is usually just another, more indirect, form of ad hominem. Appeal to the stone is a logical fallacy that dismisses an argument as untrue or absurd and proves this assertion by stating that the argument is absurd, which...

Your personal opinion means nothing to me. Revelation was written to Jewish believers. Believers who were (will be) under the law. Of course, you wouldn't know that because your doctrine came directly from God Himself , right? I will NOT discuss the dispensational issue with you any further...

Translation: I'm in a corner that I can't think of a way out of. I must therefore discredit the validity of the question by calling it foolish. I don't need to explain why it's foolish, all that is necessary is for me to proclaim it foolish and the job will be done. Classic - textbook - ad...

Well, again, you're making a dispensational error here. The fact is that in the dispensation of grace, there could be no way to blot out a name that was never in the book to begin with nor does the book in question have anything to do with believers in the age of grace. BUT - that is entirely...