Search results

The form He took is NOT relevant to the point. I thought I had made it clear. Let me repeat... Appearing in the form of a man doesn't make you a human man. GOD WAS NEVER EVER A HUMAN BEFORE THE INCARNATION!!!!! That single point along is sufficient to explode the doctrine of immutability into...

It's turned into a religious belief system. There is nothing rational about any of it. It's just fear mongering and conspiracy theories from top to bottom.

It isn't nonsense! It's the facts of reality! There isn't any question at all about it. It's very well established and unanimously accepted facts of history. Calvin's doctrine is nothing really but a reformation version of Augustinian theology and Augustine very very clearly states that he...

The person of the Trinity whom we refer to as God the Son has always existed along with the Father and Holy Spirit but He was not ever a man (human) before the incarnation in Mary's womb. From that point on, He has been and He will forever be a man with a human body complete with the scared...

I'm not surprised. I get them all mixed up. I can't keep up with which wacko said which wacky thing. The point is that it's not like I'm making stuff up off the top of my head. I quote a post and respond to what was says. If I make a mistake, all anyone has to do is point it out and I correct...

What are you talking about? Jesus was not the Father, He was sent by the Father! John 3:13; 3:17; 7:3, Galatians 4:4, I Corinthians 8:6; 11:3, I John 4:9, Revelation 3:14 John 16: 26 In that day you will ask in My name, and I do not say to you that I shall pray the Father for you; 27 for...

I agree. The truth is done no favors when it is argued poorly. A skilled debater could flip an argument from silence fallacy against someone who uses it because if you are arguing that silence is something other than silence then why do you get to declare what the silence means? Why couldn't...

Battle Royales usually have time constraints that require a commitment that I cannot make. A One on One perhaps but a full blown Battle Royale is probably not in the cards. Not that he would agree to do either one.

Judge Rightly is more than capable of responding here and I look forward to his own response but I just cannot resist posting a response of my own here... Starting point for what, man? I think his name was Adam. Ever heard of him? Well, like JR said, this is called moving the goal post. Your...

Word's right out of the mouth of the likes of David Koresh, Benny Hinn, and Yahweh Ben Yahweh. If you don't need to proof text then stop doing it. Lon, if you lie to me again, I will simply put you on ignore and you can go tell all your make-believe friends that "give you a hard time" that...

I love it when people claim that I am "wrong on so much" but will not present one single solitary refutation of any argument I have ever presented on any subject on this website over the last twenty years. But, you're not alone, Lon! The most important, most fundamental, difference between...

I'm not so sure that any of them exist. Some might be sensor echo anomolies and "exist" in that sense but most are outright hoaxes.

Has anyone else noticed that in spite of the military claiming to have regular contact with unidentified flying objects and in spite of all the high resolution digital photography tech that exists and in spite of the military's ability to drive a missile up an enemy's left nostril from thousands...

Do you simply reject every aspect of God's use of symbols and types? Do you think it was random or by accident that the Jews were killing the Lamb of God on the very day that they were killing their Passover lambs? I mean how much more liturgical could not only the death but also the burial...

I wonder whether I should hold my breath in wait for someone to present any real evidence that transubstantiation actually happens? No. I think I won't be doing that.

Yes, Mark 16! That's what I get for doing these posts in a rush. There can be no argument on this point. The prohibition against the consumption of blood is clear, as you have just shown. If you think that the bible condones the consumption of human blood (i.e. cannibalism) because of Leviticus...

Excellent point! They take these passages in a woodenly literal manner but you don't see the same people taking John 16 quite a literally and doing things like handling snake and drinking strychnine. Actually, the bible expressly forbids the drinking of blood (Genesis 9:2-4; Leviticus 17:14), a...

Yeah, well that may be taking a bit too far. There are lots of Christians who believe wacky things but who still love God and trust in Christ's shed blood as the payment for their sin and that God raised Him from the dead. In other words, believing this one wacky doctrine does not absolutely...

They go way further than that! They believe that the bread and wine physically become the actual flesh and blood of the glorified Christ! The belief is called transubstantiation and it's superstitious nonsense that the bible does not teach and that does not happen.

You are delusional! Not to mention irrational, or didn't you think I'd notice the little "guilt by association" fallacy you threw into your comment. Do you believe that sky is blue? If so, that's the same view as all atheists. Does that imply you're wrong about the color of the sky? It's just...