Search results

Notice no explanation as to why the fallacy he's accused of doesn't apply! That's because it does!

Then why doesn't life spout up all over the place? Some plant, animal or person dies and there sits a whole pile of every possible molecule that could ever be wanted for a new life-form to spout into existence and yet nothing but death and decay happens. Even after weeks and months of decay...

I've answered the question multiple times! It is therefore you who are not paying attention! NOW ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!! Coward!

They do not believe that there is any reason why God sends some to Hell and others not, except that it pleases their god to do so. God's pleasure is THE ONLY reason ANYTHING happens. “Therefore, those whom God passes over, he condemns; and this he does for no other reason than that he wills to...

The question makes perfect sense, it is your doctrine which makes no sense! Your doctrine teaches that sinners sin because God predestined that they would do so. According to Calvinism, anyone who goes to Hell doesn't do so because they failed to seek God but because God predestined that they...

You're not making any sense.

Yes! Definitely! I see that you can't tell when you've contradicted your own position!

It is genuinely baffling to me how people can be so willfully blind. Justice is not a difficult concept! Deuteronomy 32:4 He is the Rock, His work is perfect; For all His ways are justice, A God of truth and without injustice; Righteous and upright is He. They are so blind in fact that even...

He won't answer you. If he did, he'd tell you that part of God's immutability is God's impassibility. He is not happy now, angry later, sad next week and then happy again in the spring. All such talk of God being angry or saddened or pleased is all just a figure of speech. It's all...

It's far far worse than that, marke! It is NOT that God doesn't allow sinners to get saved. The concept of someone allowing something to happen or not presupposes that its possible for it to happen in the first place. God doesn't merely allow sin, He ordains it. He doesn't merely disallow some...

Notice how every argument to the contrary is ignored by the Calvinist? They don't care about truth because they don't worship the God of truth. They worship a figment of Aristotle's imagination.

That might be the stupidest thing I've read in the last six months! Just because we cannot create or destroy energy doesn't mean that the SUPER-NATURAL God can't do so! God isn't bound by the laws of physics! DUH!

That question only makes sense to ask from within your own twisted paradigm. Any answer to that question would only ever serve as some sort of queer point in the mind of someone who has redefined practically every word in the English language to suit their false teaching. Does the drowning man...

I'll stop short of calling this a lie in the intentional sense of the word because this fool actually does believe this nonsense, but it is very definitely a false teaching. The fact that man has a free will is not only evident in every single moment of our lives but it is a concept found...

You read your doctrine into every passage you read and think you've presented a proof text! You are quite literally blinded by your own rhetoric. You won't even rationally discuss anything because you can't. You redefined every theological word of any importance to the point that you aren't even...

You read your doctrine into every passage you read and think you've presented a proof text! You are quite literally blinded by your own rhetoric. You won't even rationally discuss anything because you can't. You redefined every theological word of any importance to the point that you aren't even...

Unfalsifiable nonsense! When you're allowed to redefine words and to make up new terms that have whatever meaning you need them to have to fit your doctrine then the doctrine becomes unfalsifiable and therefore meaningless. For the Calvinist, it is even worse than that because the do not stop...

No it most certainly is not Paul's! That is advice! Terrific advice to be sure but Paul (i.e. God through Paul) is not giving us a new law! The previous verse says, "The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. And likewise the husband does not have authority over...

Translation: "No, I can't point to any post anywhere, on any thread at any time, where any such claim was made. How dumb of you to ask! Did you think I had actually read any of this thread?"

What I am reacting to is your contention that a spouse has no right to refuse sex which is completely asinine and leads to a situation where rape is not possible within a marriage.