Search results

A lack of "proof," or evidence, does nothing to eliminate an idea.

Perhaps. My point was more philosophical. China is not going to invade if it thinks the US would be involved to that extent. So if it does act, Taiwan needs to defend itself. And there are reasons that it hasn't, most notably being the whole landing issue. My disagreement here is with the...

Entropy sinks Darwinism. Unless the provide a mechanism that turns sunlight into genetic information.

A US intervention will mean very little to whether a Chinese invasion would succeed. The onus is always on the defending nation.

That's leftists.

Because they do not respect the scientific method.

If the people of any nation should know that population counts do not translate into military success, it should be the US.

Yeah, because Taiwan has no hope of ever defending itself against the vast nation of China. That's why China has spent 70 years plotting to invade, but never has. 🤨

About 50 percent voted for her. :idunno:

This is why governments ban guns.

We have discussed with him his Q posts and why he made them. When was the last time you questioned the insane things that liberals assert are reliable?

I just noticed that my post is missing a "no" :noid:

10 mil would "really hurt."

Stuff like that would likely be in the terms of the agreement. I'm not saying the settlement was that low -- it almost certainly wasn't -- but likewise, there's almost no chance that it was in the hundreds of millions.

Which is like saying it's not a poetry book. Was it meant to say "six days"? Because it says "six days."

Sandman settled for an undisclosed amount. It might have been US$10,000.

My theory is that dinos tasted like chicken. That explains why they went extinct and why Darwinists are so confused.

So people believe things, therefore... something?

Democracy turns people into pansies.

Bigstackd casting Wintergatan LowkoTV Cracking the Cryptic Darkhorse podcast The Armchair Historian China Uncensored