Search results

It isn't all about moss. Read up. It doesn't matter if plants die. What matters is what happens when what remains enters the soil again. The Bible says "six days" and "the whole Earth." The problem with how you worship the likes of Blablaman and Alate is that you present nothing to show...

You don't know that vegetation, even with soil, can float?

:LOL: It sums up how a combination of thinking Alate is Wonder Woman and your incredible ignorance result in unbridled worship of utter stupidity. That was the start of a sequence in which Alate insisted -- despite her claims to expertise as a biologist -- that plants cannot survive being...

Yes, you were. However, given that you have difficulty understanding basic terms and definitions in general as evidenced with your bizarre ramblings on here you're certainly free to "think" that you weren't.

Blablaman in that thread tried defending eye evolution using a source that admitted they had no idea how eyes evolved: Talk about being podded.

:LOL: The very first reply exposes the Darwinist. They call their ideas "science," committing the logical fallacy of begging the question. Schooled? They don't even pass the first and simplest test.

Here it is again: Darwinism has failed the entropy test. There it is right there. It would take some kind of insane conspiracy theorist to deny that. You just assert stuff that veers from the ridiculous to bizarre and it's gotten beyond boring. The "screeching" is simply yours as are the...

Of course it has. As luck would have it, I provide reasons for what I believe. Oh, no. No. You never call anyone names. :LOL: :LOL: Your beliefs about whales don't mean much when they aren't here to protect you. The screeching is all yours. Naw. Address the issues sensibly. Stop...

Remember that time Blablaman thought he had refuted a point I made because I quoted an author and he had a signed copy of the author's book? I do. His argument was the author's words did not mean what they said because he had attended a lecture and gotten a scrawled message in a book. He dined...

Well, yes, I do. Darwinism failed the entropy test. Reason. Maybe. But you offer nothing to support your assertions. I guess you think people will change their minds because you can shout? Darwinism failed the entropy test. That you can call me names doesn't refute nothing. No link. No...

Reasons, remember? I justify my ideas with reasons. Evolution failed the entropy test. All we have from you is your insistence that I'm a "moron." No reasoning. No logic. No content. All fluff. You're 100 percent spam. You get asked to explain things, but you routinely ignore the invitations...

By all means, present this not vague theory of evolution.

All of that drivel can be boiled down to: "I disagree," which can simply be assumed for any response you ever write. Nothing you post adds anything of value to a discussion. Darwinism failed the entropy test. So science throws things out that don't hold up, but that's not the same as...

No argument there. :D

:LOL: Did someone claim that "science is one man's opinion"? Answer: No. Nobody claimed any such thing. "The game of science is, in principle, without end. He who decides one day that scientific statements do not call for any further test, and that they can be regarded as finally verified...

Of course it does. "A theory that has withstood rigorous testing should be deemed to have received a high measure of corroboration. and may be retained provisionally as the best available theory until it is finally falsified and/or is superseded by a better theory." Another clear example of...

Karl Popper: Every genuine scientific theory then, in Popper’s view, is prohibitive, because the theories of natural science take the form of universal statements. “All As are X” is equivalent to “No A is not-X” which is falsified if “Some A is not-X” turns out to be true. For example, the law...

Golly, I hope not.

That's right. It's not about "establishing theories." Scientists hold onto their ideas lightly, as the scientific process is to attack them, expose them and eradicate them. They must hold firm to the laws of physics, logic and maths, while eschewing any attachment to theories.

Nope. Theories never become established. Science is the process of throwing theories out. If you've got an "established theory," what you have is a cult. You know nothing about the philosophy of science.