Search results

Get rid of the biologist and the philosopher both. To determine what was required for the fossil record to be created requires a geologist. And when it comes to how rocks were made, there's only one viable candidate: a global flood.

Second verse... It's not OK to be gay, It's not OK to be perverted, You shouldn't live that way, What you need is to be converted.

This is utterly unresponsive. Men can "draw conclusions" based on any amount of observations, including none. The idea that all life is descended from a universal common ancestor by means of random mutations and natural selection will never be anything greater than a theory.

Like I say. An appeal to authority cannot overthrow the simple assertion of the opposite. When there is a disagreement, it must be the evidence that is examined. A valid appeal to authority would require both sides to bow to that authority. It is indeed always fallacious to answer a...

"I don't like this cat. He reads minds." This is the logical fallacy of an appeal to popularity and authority. While it is true that most experts advocate Darwinism, that does nothing to establish the veracity of the theory. When you learn how to stop committing logical fallacies, perhaps you...

God said it's a real big no-no.

You shouldn't live that way...

This a typical tactic of the Darwinist. They are asked to provide evidence, they proclaim how popular their idea is and then get upset when their pathetic attempts to derail the topic get called on them. Then engage over the evidence. Nope. It's a logical fallacy to assert that the...

It's not OK to be a homo.

It's not OK to be gay.

Homos should get back in the closet where they belong.

A "valid" appeal to authority cannot overturn a competing theory. Darwinists use appeals to authority to deny challengers a seat at the table. They always use it in an invalid fashion.

Leftists don't care about the meaning of words. They only care about how words make them feel, or what they think others will feel because of them.

It's a pity that your idols are all dead.

So quit screeching about people presenting reasons to question the US election. Of course I have. Everything I have said is backed up by news reports, polls and company actions, and I have referenced those sources. For example, Hunter Biden was mixed up with billionaires. The New York Post...

To be fair, voter fraud is hardly much of a crime. It's right up there with jaywalking, in the big scheme of things. The real problem with Muppets such as Brain is that they are pro-abortion, pro-homo socialists.

Oh, so you're racist now? Let's clue you in: Where I'm from is no rational counter to the evidence I present. So when you insist that people should either accept your ideas or move to Russia, that's not an attempt to silence them. Gotcha.

Yeah, and guess what? We do present evidence. But all you do is screech. Something about JFK's son now. So we just have to take your word for it? Nope. Everywhere. Except when you say that if I don't like something I should move to Saudi Arabia instead of expressing myself. Gotta love it, huh?

Interpretation? It's English, buddy. If you don't like it, by all means, explain why we must consider some ideas to be "science" and others not rather than applying the same standard to all of them.

Do QAnon people present evidence? Are you capable of assessing that evidence and providing your own to show them how what they say cannot be true? Nope. You don't. You just screech. Which investigation confirmed the integrity of the election? I don't care about election results. Perhaps one...