Search results

You'll have to start considering evidence rather than simply believing what Wiki tells you.

Neanderthals were people who lived a long time. My idea has the advantage of scientific backing — genetics show that they were practically indistinguishable from modern humans and skull analyses indicate later onset of puberty — as well as not requiring invention of non-Biblical history...

Explanations aren't evidence.

Based on evidence and reason. Evidence: The cosmic microwave background shows that something light-related permeated the universe in its earliest days. Reason: The Bible says there was a source of light and "evening and morning." You might use the perjorative "conjecture" to ridicule our...

What's your evidence for this belief?

By having the light from one side of the planet. Because there was a light source and a rotating Earth. It's a contest between what scripture says and what you say. The Bible is explicit. Genesis is an account of history and it presents the creation as happening in six days. There is no...

It's an idea.

The cosmic microwave background.

Yip. Scary, huh?

Genetically, neanderthals are humans. Modern humans closer to neanderthals than chimps are to other chimps. Read Buried Alive, by Jack Cuozzo.

What do you mean "accept"? The Bible says that the sign of God's promise was the rainbow "in the clouds." It doesn't really matter to me where people see a rainbow and remember scripture.

Mask policy. Lockdowns. "Vaccines." Plastic dividers. Ivermectin. Hydroxychloroquine. Vitamin D. People would have been far better off doing the exact opposite of what the government ordered in relation to these topics. Masks stop droplets, but the virus spreads via aerosols. Places that...

Guess what? From day 1 to 3 there was light and a rotating Earth.

Let's look at text that we should agree is allegorical. Here is a passage from the first chapter of Pilgrim's Progress. Are we to believe that the author did not mean one literal night because the book is an allegory of the Christian faith? That is what you're asking us to believe about...

Not really. I have the perfect tool to deal with such "problems."

For example, you say that "six days" cannot mean what it plainly says "because it's allegorical." You do realize how utterly inane that assessment is, right? Why is it allegorical? Why do you believe that? How does the use of allegory dictate that elements of a story cannot be accurate?

Uh huh. We know why you'll keep whining about this distraction instead of engaging substantively on the questions you've been challenged with.

Except for the — literally — thousands of posts that have been penned on that word and its many uses. It is a deflection. You assert — contrary to scripture — that the world is billions of years old, but are for some reason desperate to convince people that you do not deny the Bible. Your...

See? The system works.

God's promise to never again destroy the world in a flood came with the sign of the rainbow "in the clouds."