Search results

"Too heavenly minded to be of any earthly good" And 'heavenly minded' there is a false heavenly minded-ness Hoping. Real heavenly minded-ness is Colossians chapter three, the whole thing. Go back to Mass, your home.

And we know where grace came from, right in John chapter one (written to the circumcision, according to MAD). John 1:17 " For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ." And things that are the same are not different.

'DBR' to both, as Christ indeed taught them on earth during His ministry to the circumcision, the 'DBR', which has been shown here in this thread.

So there's no law then?

So the old OT law is just changed now?

It's one way to 'skin the cat' of needing to have one world government is all. Maybe you prefer to make a brand new constitution for such a future political situation, I'm all ears.

You can't go full electric without nuclear. It's another reason for one world government.

Not me. I seek to expand America to swallow up all the other countries as more states of the Union.

Yes. What does "love" mean, as a law? How do we know whether we are obeying the law of love? Bearing in mind Hebrews 7 which says there's a new law now, not the OT law.

That's why I said I got your meaning, it was just a detail. What the US was able to do was impose a moral ideology upon Japan and Germany, and that ideological 'crash course' has been shown to be durable. As you note, their culture wasn't changed, just their morals. They both were under great...

And this doesn't address what I asked at all. It's dodging. You're trying to change the subject. What "limit" (your word) is there to the putatively absolute human right against being raped? We'll wait ... for an eternity. Well of course you hope that.

I'd be more than happy to admit all the nations of Europe as some form of new states to our Union. So basically, agreed.

You need to measure your words better Hoping. If you believe that without informed consent, no one can be guilty of any sin that they commit in such a state (i.e. without giving informed consent), then you need to change your 'messaging' because to all the world it sounds like you're advocating...

Hebrews 7: 11 " If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? 12 For the priesthood being changed...

In fact, I think, and I don't think I'm going out on a limb here, that's why they're called 'the Gospels'.

Germany and Japan was in the age of nuclear weapons, but I get your meaning. Our occupation of West Germany bordered Soviet controlled East Germany, so we were able to do this in a very 'tactical' manner with zero overflow into East Germany. We occupied that whole country until we were...

Bump @Skeeter understood if you have no answer. It's because your utilitarianism morality is wrong.

You don't have a right against ever getting arrested, just a right against ever getting arrested without justification. I listed rape. Which "limit" is there on the absolute universal human right against being raped?

Extrapolation again. Big time.

And this is when they are sinning with informed consent only, right Hoping? Because we all know that someone might be sinning without giving their informed consent, and then what you're saying here is unkind. These people are "committing sin" and you, without knowing whether they have given...