Search results

Here's three medical doctors' idea to solve the threat of nuclear MAD: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/03/17/opinions/nuclear-war-weapons-abolition-helfand-levy-bivens/index.html Basically, "ban" nukes. Gun control writ large. Typical MD thinking. smh.

Agreed in principle and disagreed that this idea is naive. What's naive is to think we can keep whistling past the graveyard when it comes to nuclear weapons, climate change, and a potential looming bolide impact. Climate change is already happening, we're way closer all of a sudden to nuclear...

How do you contain all that optimism? :D The short answer is to repeat what I've told you before. It would have to 'start small' and slow and only with polities (nations) who are actually interested in uniting, not through force. I never said through force. I never implied it. You have...

Maybe far more recently than that, for like 150 days.

Yes.

We're talking about two different categories of things. One category is those ethical matters that are moral matters, and the other category is the rest of the ethical matters that are not moral matters, but they are still ethical matters. Like smoking and exercise, but also every other thing...

But logically, all declarative indicative propositions are binary with regard to truth. Agreed.

Why don't you think that all the water would still be around somewhere after a global Flood?

I see the world ocean as evidence that water once covered the entire planet, because it currently still covers 80% of it even today.

You're just using them synonymously. Nikolai and I aren't using them synonymously.

Yeah. Agreed. In other words, it's not the Bible, it's Christ Himself.

What if they are preaching hate without informed consent? Can't your brothers and sisters and full intersex siblings make mistakes? No grace. Why are you posting in this thread? Aren't you 'in' the politics of this world, in this thread? I never said Mosaic law, nor did I mean Mosaic law...

Because of the people who apparently have lived in Africa and in the Americas for over 6000 years. Hey come on. I believe in a literal six day creation.

I elaborated upon this theme in my OP. There's no such thing as a Christ archetype. There is Christ, and then as hubristic men are wont to do, they take a perfect singularity and invent a set or category, of which Christ is but a member. Not so. Christ is categorically unique and there is...

I'm sorry to hear that @Yorzhik 'Big picture', 'taking a big step back', 'zooming out' conceptually, looking at it 'panoramically', as far as I'm concerned there are at least three reasons for why one world order or one world government is really what we all should ideologically be promoting...

I'm just making sure for the sake communication is all. Big fan of the declaratory I see. Passive aggressive rhetoric.

It has historical meaning. Like, saying the seat of the United States government is Washington D.C. has historical meaning.

2nd Peter was written to someone who Paul had also written to.

To take the Bible at its word, we have to believe that before the Flood, the earth had the same total quantity of water that it has today but that most of it was underground. We have something like this underground now, petroleum. Crude. Sometimes the crude is under pressure and all you have...

And we know Antioch is a Peterine See.