Search results

Time is the factor difference for all of us to know anything. If I adopt the OV paradigm that God must discover, in timeless sense, all of time is 'now' with but constructs. Analogy, 3 blind men talking about an elephant: One a large snake, another trees in a forest, and the third a...

Seems more like cake and eating it too, to me. If it doesn't exist, then it wasn't 'before' God created either, right?

Good thing I asked the short in the last sentence! (thank you for weighing in). In a nutshell, the Summit Clock Experiment It was one of those points where I was trying to see if Open Theists among themselves disagree, or whether I was missing a subtle difference because of importance for...

Wait as second. Which claim (or did I miss it)? I wholly appreciate two Open Theists talking about what has also troubled me, on logical points. I've similar questions so appreciate the dialogue Well, of course, he is 'going down to see' so I'd think that He 'can.' There is an importance...

Good afternoon Clete and thread, An invitation to simply clip what you want to respond to. I clipped about half and still the only two people who are going to read you and I, are you and I and I don't know about me! It will be about a 3-4 minute read, but there are a bunch of 'outs' offered...

I'd think it somewhat on point in this thread, I don't know, but great question. I wished I asked it.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-68045254 Does it make any kind of sense that any Americans march for Arab forces when U.S. citizens and forces are clearly targeted? Barring 'irrational' I'm simply not getting the 'why.'

It'd seem to take care of the debate on any given point. The Summit Clock Experiment was about God's ability/ inability to traverse increments in more than a linear direction (time). Skip to the last sentence* if I cloudy this up: If time doesn't exist, for me or another on the other...

I'm having an existential moment trying to think of your questions inside a thread that says it doesn't exist. 1)Time = a duration, an interval between two points. --It'd seem that duration happens. It'd seem that there is such a thing as an interval between two points. It'd seem a clock...

Not sure if I have the ah ha moment here, but I understand you both now: "That tree is not Christ." I need to listen to the rest of the video so I don't ask 'already answered that' questions (why are we then warned verse 21? How are we united to the same vine as Israel as gentiles...

No response, so let me rephrase and put in a little homework: Because Israel is still in God's plan, it'd seem (according to one link from dispensationalism), that Dispensationalists across board would be supportive of the state. In such a question there are two assumptions, 1) that the...

I missed it so thank you again. It is for sure that part of the video linked "That tree is not Christ!" Have to watch the rest of the video now. What I can grasp until I finish the video: 1) No, I have never thought that Christ would cut off His body. 2) As such, I have wrestled in the...

Thank you for reply with constraint. Much appreciated. On point, Wouldn't matter if it was, is what I'm saying (I hope I'm making the right response, am listening to what you are throwing down). I don't think you were making an appeal to popularity, but I took the weight of the suggestion...

It seems v21 is talking about 'don't get prideful as a new member of the body.

I appreciate the answer here too. It seemed to me it has to have such a take. The idea not to 'fear' but rather "'I'm a Baptist! God loves us!' yeah, don't do that. It isn't a group thing these days." Close?

▲I laughed, wife groaned ▲ :D

Thank you so much for taking the time. (uhhhggg) I'm reading as I'm writing and should read a bit more of Romans 11 at this venture but how do you read/take the warning of verse 21? Thank you. -Lon

Could a few of you weigh in on this please: Romans 11: 11-31 Verse 17 specifically. I'm trying to grasp what the dispensationalist means. How were believers grafted in at the time, and how specifically, to / in Israel? I'm not quite there grasping the Mid Acts point and difference.

Depends where it is and I am in the garage! :p (good point, back to the drawing board, it was rather on the precept that I can know 'something' and not the other so likely too superficial to suffice :Z). Actually, if I misread prior, I agree with this. In context of thread (if important to...