Search results

I did that. I didn't see anything wrong with it. Saying it doesn't make it so.

Apparently I do, because you CLEARLY do not understand how figures of speech work.

Saying it doesn't make it so.

It "doesn't occur to me" because that is not at all what he was doing... As Scripture is clear. In other words, you've decided that He said what you believe He said, and you're not willing to consider any other position no matter what.

Saying it doesn't make it so, and you refuse to demonstrate the claim.

He said as much. First He ignored her. Then He said to his disciples, "I am not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." Then He said to her, "It is not good to take the children's bread and throw it to the little dogs." Why is that so hard for you to understand? Says the one...

When you say that "I'm mad enough to shoot you," but it's a figure of speech, then OF COURSE it doesn't actually mean that you're going to shoot someone. It just means you're mad enough to do it! It means EXACTLY WHAT IT SAYS! I did so in BOTH. "I'm mad enough to shoot you" does not mean...

It is if it's false. And last I checked, TGP is not "thoroughly discredited" nor a "rag." Wikipedia is one witness. One witness is not enough to establish a matter. Then quit complaining about it.

What part of "The figure of speech "the words are still in one's mouth" means that the person is still uttering the words" makes you think that I do not see it as a figure of speech?

First you have to establish that God did not, in fact, call her a "doggette." Scripture says: Then Jesus went out from there and departed to the region of Tyre and Sidon. And behold, a woman of Canaan came from that region and cried out to Him, saying, “Have mercy on me, O Lord, Son of...

And yet, I, who has discernment, cannot "see right through it," whatever you think "it" is. Do they have an odd way of looking at things? Perhaps. But "total rubbish" their site is not. No, it's not. That you seem unable to provide. If you think posting a wikipedia link is sufficient...

Gentiles (as symbols of the godless) and sodomites are called "dogs" in the Bible. (For "dog" as a metaphor for filthy homosexuals see Deut. 23:17-18 and Rev. 22:15. And for this term of derision referring also to Gentiles as symbols of the ungodly see Mat. 7:6 with Lev. 22:10; Mat. 15:26; Ps...

Such as disparaging the nice folks over at TGP based on your own biases... But apparently you are unable to demonstrate it. Appeal to ridicule is a logical fallacy. In other words, all you have is your own opinion. Why should anyone care what you think, Arthur, if you can't even defend...

The figure of speech "the words are still in one's mouth" means that the person is still uttering the words. It doesn't mean that they've finished saying what they're saying. It means they're still in the process of speaking! I'm not sure why you're having such a problem with this.

It means he's really mad. It also means that this father is acting out of anger, and not love.

Once again, you're stonewalling. I asked you to read the TITLES of the articles, which I presented in post#420, and tell me which of the titles are "total rubbish." You continue to refuse to answer such a simple question! Why?! Are you scared that your position might be shown to be...

Arty is trying to have his cake and eat it too.