Search results

By Calvinists. Are you a Calvinist? I don't consider it fundamental at all. But that's neither here nor there. The point was that, in relation to what you saying immutability was incompatible with, you can safely discard immutability without contradicting reality. (IE, throwing the baby out...

Argumentum ad nauseum. Obviously not true, Gary. Of course scripture can be read many ways. But there is only one correct way, and that's through right division, something you refuse to even attempt to do, because you can't stomach the idea that your precious belief system that you've held to...

Literally not what I said at all! The scripture you quoted from Jeremiah 31 literally says, quite plainly, no interpretation needed, that the Lord "will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah." You don't get to just ignore that. Are you claiming to be of the...

What I said was not merely opinion. I made an argument, using examples from the Bible, and even asked you questions, which you will likely continue to ignore (second time you've done so, by the way). Argumentum ad lapidem - appeal to the stone. You don't get to simply dismiss an argument...

No one cares. Make an argument. Because at this point, you are literally rejecting scripture in favor of your personal beef. You need to humble yourself and ask God to forgive you, before it's too late.

The doctrine of the immutability of God is not biblical, and can be safely discarded. God is a living God. He does not change in His goodness or righteous character. But He does change in other ways. Immutability is a pagan concept that was introduced to Christianity by Augustine, who...

I'll let Paul's words speak for themselves: One person esteems one day above another; another esteems every day alike. Let each be fully convinced in his own mind. He who observes the day, observes it to the Lord; and he who does not observe the day, to the Lord he does not observe it. He who...

Agreed. Thank you, and praise God! Indeed.

I'm not. I simply don't know what you mean by "a conceptual mind." Please explain.

What is that supposed to mean?

As a concept, yes.

What part of "time does not exist outside of a thinking mind" do you not understand?

Warning: GRAPHIC CONTENT! My heart hurts from seeing this. https://www.instagram.com/p/C3QLyiXLfX0/?igsh=MWpic2RncTJubnlhYg==

Happenstance is not a miracle.

I means that, as far as I can tell, Lydia was not just another Gentile woman. She was, in all likelihood, a descendant of Israel. Baptism would have been a logical step. I'm not entirely sure, though, if I were to hazard a guess, Paul's gospel. I would argue that there simply isn't enough...

I think Paul put it best: Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; nor does corruption inherit incorruption. Behold, I tell you a mystery: We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed— in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last...