Search results

Already read that, it's not persuasive. --Dave

If the sun were millions of miles away you would be correct with this point. But the sun is not this huge sphere millions of miles away in the flat model. Both models fulfill the same effect that you describe but on different terms of the suns size and distance from the earth. So this argument...

There is a great deal of doubt about the moon landings, it has to be looked at. But that's not to say that all people who worked for NASA or with a company that was involved in the Apollo project like your Dad were part of a cover up. I certainly wish no personal disrespect toward you or your...

Duly noted. --Dave

You're "leading the witness", just make your point. --Dave

That's why I have always enjoyed this debate site over others I have been on. We can enjoy our debates but I respect the intellectual integrity of those who participate here. And please don't any one hold back, I can take a good punch. I think at this point some arguments seem to favor...

I've taken many flights back and forth from New York to Minneapolis during days, nights and evenings. But make your point. --Dave

The zoom of the camera gradually showed more and more of the ship in a way which I think demonstrates the oceans are not curved, but are in fact level. --Dave

No, I don't think Satan is trying to blind me since my faith is not based in either a global or flat theory of earth or if we went to the moon or not. As I have been saying, I have an interest in this subject, I don't have a life or death stake in it. But I am getting hungry so I would like to...

Knight, did you miss this? --Dave

My analysis/argument is correct. Your argument fails for the same reasons I've given, rewording and convoluting the same fallacy changes nothing. --Dave

The Michelson–Morley experiment addresses the rotation of the earth. That's my next stop. I will look at the pendulum argument as well this week end. --Dave

I'm not heading for the stars just yet. I'm preparing an evaluation of the Michelson–Morley experiment. --Dave

You know, and so does every one else who reads this that what I have said is absolutely correct. "Can you handle the truth"? I won't call you a moron if you don't call me daft. --Dave

This analysis is shared by many. --Dave

My analysis is absolutely correct. The speed of bullets do vary but that does not alter the argument. --Dave

I would point out that there is a huge contradiction about this. Which is why we have look at both views before we can determine who is right and who is wrong. --Dave

I'm glad you made this argument. I'll do my best to explain the "false equivalence" of this argument. There are two opposing presuppositions being used to make this case. 1. A bullet and it's equivalent, a plane, "do not" rotate with the earth. 2. A bullet and the plane "do" rotate with the...

Visiting a station is not the same as leading a naval task force with an air craft carrier to explore the vast region of the antarctic. Do some research on Admiral Byrd a see what he had to say about his exploration. --Dave

I understand what you're saying but planes flying from LA to NY at 600 mph cannot be adjusted for a globe moving at 800 mph beneath it. --Dave Sent from my iPhone using TOL