Search results

New Hampshire has the laxest gun laws in the world. Yet they're green! Can't be true.

tbh I forget what those numbers mean, but if Condition 1 means one in the chamber with the hammer back and the thumb safety engaged, then yes.

AR15's fire .22 caliber rounds, just not "the" .22 (which is a .22 LR for "long rifle"). Anna probably has a Ruger 10/22, easily the most popular rifle chambered in the .22 LR.

From Anna's post: They're objectively weapons of war. Less you think the shotties were for a Thanksgiving turkey hunt? And this is all in the context of Democrats constantly beating the drum of needing to get "weapons of war off our streets."

A weapon of war. Nice.

Really not my place to judge though, is it? "There but for the grace of God ..."

Fun! My turn! Your religion is a false religion, and all its teaching are of the devil! lol fun!

"We must get weapons of war off our streets!" -Every Democrat basically

... These are all weapons of war. Note: "RIFLES" weapons of war. "PISTOLS" weapons of war. "SHOTGUNS" weapons of war! Don't forget!

I haven't been in years; what do you mean?

It is definitely an additional duty that you voluntarily take upon yourself. You are responsible for all discharges. That's work; and that takes work. You have to be conscious of your weaponry every moment, even when you're asleep. When you're not on the same premises as all your weapons...

Regressive. Regressive. If you had said "super yachts" that's not regressive. California is one of the most paternalistic states in the nation. Does CA also tax gas? Regressive. Tobacco? Regressive. This is naked paternalism.

It makes sense in this regard: The Gospel is sown everywhere like seed. But the condition of the soil is not up to the soil, but up to God. At any rate, it's out of the hands of the one sowing the Good News. The sower should just sow, and not worry about the why's and the how's. I think...

In your opinion only: you'll never be able to cite a Calvinist agreeing with you, which makes this characterization of yours partisan. Logically prior to that, Calvinism claims that it will never happen. And why it will never happen is the next logical sequence: because we are the natural man...

Nope. There's only one layer, same as it always was. Bishops are the only layer, and they are middle managers, the lot of them, to translate their office into modern terms. Even the pope is just a middle manager. Priests are the bishops' assistants, this corresponds to the Biblical office of...

Incapable is your word. It's not about capability but whether or not it will ever happen, and it will never happen. Is an animal categorically incapable of driving a car or learning words? No, but will the animal ever actually do those things? Not in 13.8 billion years, not unless they get...

Priests are not bishops, right, good job, good for you, rolleyes.

Like I said, I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you weren't committing a straw man fallacy. But you were! I know that! False! All Calvinists instead admit that left to our own devices not a single one of us would be sinless! You say that therefore our sins wouldn't be our fault...

They're compromised. Partisans. (Democratic party operatives and or electioneers and or propagandists, whether professional or amateur.) Ideologues perhaps, but definitely partisans.

More than three times as many people in America watched a soccer match (dull) compared to wearing a gun every day. https://apnews.com/article/world-cup-entertainment-soccer-sports-international-dc41ac7132e520cea85b7a4ae57e3a65