Search results

The question is not why do apples fall.:maxi: The question is do apples fall to the ground on earth for the same reason planets orbit the sun in outer space. --Dave

But is not the earth "unlike" everything else we see out there? The earth has water/oceans, life/biology, atmosphere/oxygen. If nothing else in the known universe has what we have then why does the earth have to be like those waterless, lifeless, non-atmospheric spinning balls of light? I...

I changed my mind, I will comment on this. Newton did not discover anything, a falling apple is not an experiment and imagining that what makes a apple on earth fall to the ground does not prove there are planets orbiting the sun for the same reason the apple fell--gravity. Gravity is an idea...

People interpreting the data have a motive. So whats your motive here? --Dave

Good job now start your own thread on this. --Dave

A "motive" has nothing to do with data and bad motive is about control not logic. --Dave

Can you explain the difference between Newton and Einstein on gravity? Can you solve the problem of gravity vs expansion? Are you proposing a unified theory of everything? Do you think there is only one unified theory of the origin, nature, and destiny of the universe? You can start your...

That's not what I said. I was answering a question as to who would have a motive for misleading the world about the shape of the earth. That question is, "if the earth is flat" then "what is the motive for lying" about it. My response is that "if" the earth is flat then Satan is behind the...

And just so lazy. I don't think I can take you seriously. Just a little work on your part could change my mind. --Dave

--Dave :wave2:

Why don't you read what's already been posted on this thread? Most of your questions have already been addressed. --Dave

No, that's not what flat earth is. The people with mental illness are the ones who think that is what flat earth is. --Dave

And the same can be said of you, which is why your mind set argument is itself a logical fallacy. --Dave

I'm certainly not craving your attention. If that's you in the pic, you're ugly, get another pic. You're also projecting, though I doubt you know what that means, :rotfl: --Dave

I know what you said, it was a good point. I don't know if it's decisive, but it's a good observation and when I view them now I keep that in mind, and that's helpful. --Dave

Yes for me personally, and for others as well I hope. But what ever I decide will not be based on your or any one else's charge of insanity or stupidity or...you get the point. I was asked by friends of mine when I was thinking about becoming a Christian if I had lost my mind. Their are lots of...

All video and photos from every source for stars is acceptable evidence for either position. I will be comparing all of them and I will be open to arguments from both sides. I want to make up my own mind on this and want every one else to be able to do the same with out one side or the other...

I saw the link and it was informative. I certainly will compare it with all the other sites I can find, thanks. Something I don't think you appreciate is that I studied Calvinism in order to reject it in favor of the free will of man. I studied the whole history of the nature of God which...

Then post your pictures, I'd love to see them. --Dave

The scientific "method" is not the issue, the scientific "assumption", that the earth is moving around the sun, is the issue. You have to prove the earth moves before you can make a triangulation you suggested: "They can indeed empirically measure a star's parallax by taking an image one day...