Search results

Can you clarify? idk. Could be what happened to King Saul is not what the New Testament is talking about, and what is happening to us, under the New Covenant. Could very well be. Good point about Paul. That's fine with me. OK. OK. Synonymous with attributes. Near-synonymous with...

Close enough. When you abstain from voting you in effect are giving your vote to the actual voters, you are implicitly entrusting them with your vote. A proxy. So if a Democrat wins your state and you didn't vote, you contributed to that election result by proxy, meaning that you gave half...

ME! No. The winning party gets the half vote. The loser ... loses. That's why it's half a vote. If instead you vote Republican, the Republicans get the full vote. So vote Republican.

There are bishops, like Timothy and Titus. As far as the Bible's concerned there is one office of bishop (1st Timothy 3:1), and we can track that office throughout extra-Biblical history going all the way back to the first century. Plain.

I think it turned out OK. ;)

OK. I had to conjecture, since you only posted the link without comment. :)

OK but remember that right in the introduction to John, which to you and yours isn't even written to the Church which is His Body (only to the Church which is His Bride (because you confusingly bifurcate the two in your narrative)) , John says Grace comes from Christ, and Law is from Moses...

Iraqi's like very many other people tolerate political high crimes. Simple as. You can lead a horse to water, but in order to force him to drink, you'd literally have to occupy indefinitely, iow colonize, or just flat out annex them, at least until they understand American morality. Like...

So your definition of baptism would be immersion, but basically a ceremonial washing, yes? But being immersive is required for you to call it baptism, is this correct? And you and I both know that you're promoting a partisan position in saying that, favoring the Baptists over almost everybody...

We're the Church in the Bible, with the Biblical bishops, like Timothy and Titus.

Interesting that of the prophets Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel and Daniel (all roughly contemporaries), the first is mentioned by name in the NT, the second referenced (at the Last Supper with Christ mentioning Jeremiah's New Covenant), while Ezekiel and Daniel are only alluded to with the title...

Nowhere in the OT is anybody explicitly baptized in the name of Christ, but confer: Exodus 40:12 Leviticus 8:6 People are baptized Psalm 51:2 51:7 David requests to be baptized Ezekiel 16:9 God baptized Jerusalem Along with dozens of instances of people baptizing themselves.

You're out of your mind. Not only does one have nothing to do with the other, but it's actually closer to the truth that more military activity is one of the few options the wealthy have to solve world hunger. As you're unaware of this fact, that starvation and impoverishment and abject...

Are Timothy and Titus in "Peter's church?"

Thanks for confirming my suspicions.

Vote Republican.

Easy. The Church with the bishops.

This part: "If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us." Right? You have yourself a contradiction between John and Jesus, one saying we all sin, and the Other saying if you sin the truth is not in you. And Dispensationalism doesn't resolve that...