Search results

I would point out that death didn't enter the world until after the fall, yet Adam and Eve (and other creatures) still had to eat, and plants were on the menu. So clearly the Bible doesn't consider their deaths as the death spoken of later. Why not?

I'm not sure.

Let me rephrase. Pathogens are what we call microorganisms that cause disease. Those microorganisms, as initially designed, would not have originally caused disease.

You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James2:24&version=NKJV If you DO something in order to obtain something, that is a work. Someone is justified by works, according to James. Paul says: For if Abraham was...

I'm not disagreeing with this. Sure. That's a jump in logic. There is no evidence to support that they were made by men. There are plenty of other creatures in nature (designed by God) that have mechanical features. For example, Issus coleoptratus have literal gears built into their legs...

Possibly. If they were blood borne at that time, they wouldn't have caused disease (diseases are a result of the Fall). At the very least, the pathogen Kinds existed.

The crucial point is that Christ was the passover Lamb. He was killed the same day that the animal lamb was being killed (probably at the same time), in preparation for the Passover, since they could not do any work on the passover, it had to be done before. Thursday crucifixion Friday Passover...

No, that was part of their original function. Pre-Fall. The answer is in the post you quoted.

Because we live in the present, and it's easier for people today to understand. Right, that's because it assumes a Friday crucifixion. I'm challenging that assumption.

He completed one of her ovum. At which point, the Second Person of the Trinity put on that human body (because human life begins at conception), and became a man.

Don't we all? They aren't. The ancients were certainly geniuses, but there's no reason to think that they were even aware of what goes on at the microscopic level, let alone being able to build and create things at that size. That's because they ARE manufactured. Not by humans, no, but by...

Because Friday was a high Sabbath (yearly), while Saturday was a normal, weekly Sabbath.

I have no idea what you're talking about. This is why I told you to step out of the Catholic tradition for a moment.

@rstrats here is the corrected timeline from the above ChatGPT link: Revised Timeline with a Thursday Crucifixion Wednesday Night (Beginning of Thursday by Jewish Time) - The Last Supper (Passover meal) is eaten after sunset (Luke 22:14-20, Matthew 26:26-29). - Jesus predicts Peter’s denial...

Step out of the Catholic tradition for a moment, Idolater. A Friday crucifixion doesn't work, because it doesn't align with the narrative and other corroborating details. The corrected timeline is at the end of this: https://chatgpt.com/share/67bb6375-12c0-8001-ba7a-91eb3e7cf1d7

Christ was crucified on Thursday, was in the tomb Friday and Saturday (both of those days were Sabbaths that year), and rose on the third day, Sunday.

I noticed you dodged the question. Here it is again: Can you please explain why things go DOWN, and not up, even when they lose mass?

Oh really? So if you boil some water in a kettle, and it starts boiling, and you put a piece of paper or paper towel or tissue over the spout, what happens to it? Does it start to be pushed up? You know, because of the pressure? Pressure that isn't in a container.... Huh, almost like you CAN...

I suppose you reject the claim "Scientists have created life in a lab" too, right? Because it goes against the "virtue" of the physics and chemistry of how such "life" (if it can even be called that) could come into existence? Or is that a special case where you ignore the fact that such "life"...