Search results

Let's keep politics out of this, shall we? Stay on topic. Appeal to popularity. Then the onus is on you to show how it's CGI. ALL proof by (repeated) assertion. You keep making blanket statements without backing them up, and then when called out on it, you ignore the responses. As far as...

Even more stupid to (continue to) defend something that has already been refuted a thousand times over by me and others on this and the original thread. And God says two or three witnesses shall establish a matter... Size of Australia, measured distance of sun from earth when sun is .1 degree...

And there it is, claiming victory because no one wants to listen to stupidity.

Man, you and I are on a roll haha

There's a discussion for that going on here: https://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?p=5256958

You must be blind, Dave. Look at the picture you posted. Compare mine with yours. Do you see that little circle in the middle of what you call the sun? That's the actual sun, Dave. So yes, Dave, I don't just "think I can see" where the flare begins, I highlighted where it DOES begin.

Yes, he can. So the land moves? This has been answered, but you ignored it. I know it has been answered because I answered it myself. No, I'm not going to redo the math, and no, I'm not going to go find my post containing the math. Figure it out yourself.

Ok, and?

No, because I can go out and see the real thing whenever I want. Something you should do.

Once again, you didn't read what I wrote. I said your argument assumes that "four corners" is literal. And it doesn't imply flat earth at all. Dave, how many corners does a tetrahedron have? 4 Is it flat? NO Which means that "four corners" doesn't necessarily mean that whatever object...

Then don't lump things that on their own have nothing to do with either side into the side of the atheists. You're the one who brought it up, Dave.

Hey, Dave, have you ever looked at map of the world? Like this one: How many corners are there? 4 Does the map cover the entire earth? Yes. Your argument assumes that "four corners" is literal. I've told you that it is a fact that "four corners" is an idiom, a figure of speech.

No, Dave, it doesn't. At this point we're no longer talking about things "at the particle level." So are you saying that "chance" is evil because (at least according to you) it implies atheism and evolution and 'old universe'? No, Dave, it doesn't. "Infinity" simply describes "how many."...

Go read the link, because it's clear that you didn't.

Dave, Dave, Dave! "Four corners of the earth" is an idiom, a figure of speech, that means "all parts of the world". The word used in Isaiah, KANAPH, generally means "extremity." https://christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-c017.html

That's not what I said, Dave, and you know it. I said that they wrote from their perspective. A car seen from one side is the exact same car seen from the other side.

The Bible is written from the perspective of man. It's not written from God's perspective. Yes, God inspired the authors to write what they wrote, but that doesn't mean that everything was made clear to them so that they understood everything they saw and wrote about.

No, Dave, it doesn't. If anything, it shows how brilliant God is, how carefully He designed our universe. Now you're conflating ideas. Evolution is by chance. Mathematics is not. Dave, do you know what quantum even means? It means: It has absolutely nothing to do with atheism.

I didn't call you dumb, Dave. I asked if you were, because I can't believe you can't understand what I'm asking.

Are you dumb, Dave? 6 miles is the diameter of the circle on the sphere of the Earth that is visible from a human being on its surface. So, again I ask, how curved would a scaled down 6 mile segment be on your graph paper? Would the curve be noticeable?