Search results

This thread is, in fact, in the Politics section. Don't be afraid of talking politics in here. Moving the goalposts is a bad idea, Chair.

Constantly restating your position is not "explaining your point." DUH, but he CAN after the Father calls him, per John 6:44, 65. He can after the Father calls him, as per the above verses.

Or an intelligent Being.

No, you have not. Except that he can after the Father calls him. See, the verse even says so! Jesus was very clear: They do have the ability after the Father calls them. John 6:44: No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up at the last day. John...

It's not a red herring. Doing evil that good may come of it is wrong, Hill. Voting for an evil person because the other guy is more evil will only lead to an evil person being in a position of leadership. Do you agree that both Stalin and Hitler were evil men? If so, why would you vote for...

Are you asserting that neither Hitler nor Stalin were evil?

Chapter verse that says they become new creatures when they are called. Repeating yourself doesn't magically make what you said come true. Jesus was very clear: They do have the ability after the Father calls them. John 6:44: No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him...

Then why do you reject what He says?

He can be effective because He is omnicompetent. To use a chess analogy, God isn't controlling all the pieces on the chessboard and His opponent directly (as Determinism would have you believe). He's simply smart enough to win every match despite his opponent's moves. Why would God be...

That's called doing evil that good might come of it, Hill. Paul condemns that: Romans 3:8: And why not say, “Let us do evil that good may come”?—as we are slanderously reported and as some affirm that we say. Their condemnation is just.

Please answer the question I asked: Which sin, if any, is NOT evil? I did read them. I don't find where any of them say that the government is required to take part in such. Do you? If so, please show me where it says that the government is to be involved in such giving. Still missing the...

Would you vote for Hitler or Stalin if their opponent was Satan?

I advise you to listen to this show: https://kgov.com/john-sanders-open-theism-interview-historic-considerations (Part 1) https://kgov.com/bel/20210407 (Part 2) (@Lon Part 2 of the above show is now available at the link above)

They do have the ability after the Father calls them. See? John 6:44: No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up at the last day. John 6:65: And He said, “Therefore I have said to you that no one can come to Me unless it has been granted to him by...

That's because you're trying understand through calvinistic lenses. Take them off, then maybe you can see clearly. Man does have the ability to come to Christ after the Father calls. John 6:44, 65.

Libtards also don't seem to realize that colder temperatures mean higher chance of diseases spreading... or maybe they do and that's the point...

Libtards don't seem to realize that colder climates don't support crops very well... or maybe they do and that's the point...

All forms of "democracy" are evil. Uh, no, that would be God who gave humans human rights, and He did that when He created man. Because you say so? Because in the book of Genesis, even Cain was afraid of having his life taken from him by others because he was a murderer. Which means that...

He does after the Father calls. Jesus says so, John 6:44, 65.

Could you provide the data on that?