Search results

Fallacies won't help you here, Caino. Of course not. I'm simply stating the facts. Sorry, but it doesn't have any such thing. You seem to have rushed this post and forgot to finish two of your sentences... It was written by a fallible man/fallible men. A fairy tale cannot make more...

Yeah you did. No, it only fuels theories that oppose reality. Says the one indoctrinated by a cult... Mirror. Look in it.

Your point?

Fairy tale. How so? You keep making these blanket statements, but never really give any details. "Institution of Judaism"? To what, exactly, are you referring to? The commandments are, in fact, a burden. Something that is mentioned by Paul... Yet not by any Hebrew... There's a reason...

A quick note about "Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated": "Love and hate" is a Hebrew idiom for "love more and love. Esau wasn't hated by God. Jacob was simply loved by God so much that it was as if He hated Esau.

A fairy tale. False. Because they had the true history, revealed directly to them by God. And yet, as I linked to previously, nearly every culture in the world has some sort of flood myth or cataclysmic event in their history. Sorry, but there's not. Adam was the first man God created...

No such thing. What I believe has nothing to do with it. Evolution is another fairy tale told by people who hate God, similar to the UB. I'm glad you think so highly of me, though I hate to burst your bubble, because I'm just a truck driver who grew up in a good Christian home, and went to...

Indeed it is. The proof is that the universe is young. Wishful thinking. Indeed it does, especially cults like Urantia. What it does NOT do is debunk the Bible, only affirms it.

Because you say so? The Bible records Jesus saying "go ye into the world." Yet the Bible does not record any ministries they may have had outside of Jerusalem, other than brief, indirect mentions. There's a reason for this, and it's explained by Paul in Galatians 2:7-9. Where and how the...

And yet, just a few verses earlier, Peter refers to Christ as LORD (capital L small capital ORD). “Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a Man attested by God to you by miracles, wonders, and signs which God did through Him in your midst, as you yourselves also know—Him, being...

Not required, even in Greek. And certainly not needed by the context. Well, no, it would be specifying two objects, not one. Here's an example: "The boss of me, and the friend of me." No "both" needed. You're grasping at straws here, Omni. You should stop. "The Lord of me and the God of...

Because that's not how people speak. And the context of the passage makes it abundantly clear.

Uh, yeah, he was, because that's the only thing that the context allows: Now Thomas, called the Twin, one of the twelve, was not with them when Jesus came.The other disciples therefore said to him, “We have seen the Lord.” So he said to them, “Unless I see in His hands the print of the nails...

In other words: virtue signalling.

In what way is that any different to what the Bible teaches? Sounds like a case of pot calling kettle black...

Fixed

Ok, so are you saying that you did something wrong? But why the need for forgiveness?

Why does he need to forgive you in the first place?

I wonder why....

You should watch the following video.