Search results

I don't care about your opinion unless you can back it up with facts and strong reasoning, and most importantly, with Scripture! What I care about are the facts, namely, the fact that you have yet to make a compelling argument FOR your opinions, especially one that hasn't already been addressed.

No one has argued otherwise. Again:

https://kgov.com/bel/20050601

thatsthejoke.jpg

Objectively, it's quite clear who's unwilling to be convinced. I'm not the one using phrases like "I still believe..." after being rebutted, however soundly, in the previous post They were rejecting God's timing for a king. Such is, inherently, a rejection of God as their King. Pay attention...

You still aren't getting it. There is no "that world." There is only "the world." You keep reading your beliefs into the text as if that makes them correct, but it doesn't. The world was dead. God gave His life, His own received Him not. Those are the facts. Saying it doesn't make it so...

In other words, you're not willing to be convinced otherwise. God wanted them to have a king. Thus, their desire for a king wasn't wrong, but their impatience and unwillingness to wait on God was what was wrong.

Marke, I apologize. I mistakenly referred you to the criminal justice system seminar, which has very little to do with the structure of government, and more to do with just the justice system of a just government. (It's still worth every penny, though, and honestly, I don't know why they don't...

I strongly recommend that, before you continue in this thread, that you listen to/watch Bob Enyart's "God's Criminal Justice System" seminar or even just read through his syllabus. In both of those, Bob responds to the very argument you just tried to make.

YES. No. "His own" are part of the world. "His own" RECEIVED HIM NOT. You CANNOT get around that, which is why you're wrong.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life. Jesus came unto His own, and His own, received Him not. Your argument has been disproven. "He came unto His own, and His own received Him not." :yawn: Not always, as I've already shown, which you refuse to acknowledge. Nope, you're reading...

Sounds like a hypocrite.

Saying it doesn't make it so. "He came unto His own and His own received Him not." God never effectually gives life to people. He only gives life to those who believe.

False and contrary to scripture, which says believing comes before being saved. Which isn't permanent.

Then say he's not a human. Because he is, indeed, a person.

It's certainly easy to be an armchair critic... Those 2 thugs that died should have been behind bars awaiting trial, if not already executed for his crimes... Again, free country, citizens can go anywhere they please (barring restricted areas), and Kyle certainly did have business there, as...

I have. And yes, the devil is, indeed, a person.

Saying it doesn't make it so. No, that's you reading your beliefs onto scripture. Scripture, however, does not say that only the elect are saved, and in fact, it shows many of the elect going to hell! Yes, "the world." Not "the world of God's elect" (a phrase not found in scripture), not...

How? By humbling themselves and opening their eyes, and uncovering their ears. From : The Perfect Tense is a tense of verbs in Koine Greek. It is usually used to show that a past event has occurred with present ongoing consequences. With that clearly defined: This is flatly false. There...

He's so loving that he sent His Son to die for the entire world.