Search results

Mere assertions won't get you anywhere. The Bible says, in fact, it's God Himself saying it, quite plainly: The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not bear the guilt of the father, nor the father bear the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the...

Dead means "separated." It doesn't mean "nonexistent" or "unconscious." "Dead in trespasses and sins" is just an easier way to say "separated from God because of your trespasses and sins." It DOES mean exactly that, GD! It means their spirits are experiencing "spiritual separation," being cut...

Go back and look for it, Derf. Don't be lazy. And if you can't find the answer where it's supposed to be, point it out.

Who said it did? If anything, it means "The God who Self-Exists." Other things given in scripture show God who exists as "the living God." Not. The only one who's confused is you, because when you try to make the rational sound irrational, you're guaranteed to become confused. Which...

Get out of here with your Catholic nonsense. There is one (I repeat, ONE (1)) mediator between God and man, the Man Christ Jesus.

So what? The LXX is a translation of the Hebrew texts. Translating from Hebrew to Greek (or from any language to any other language, for that matter) guarantees a loss of information. Things get "lost in translation," as it were. The Hebrew uses a plural forms for the verb "make," and the...

Now if Christ is preached that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead?But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ is not risen.And if Christ is not risen, then our preaching is empty and your faith is also empty.Yes, and...

What even are you talking about? So you're calling Jesus a liar? Allow me to word this in a way that makes sense to your modern ear:" "...although the works from the foundation of the world were finished." The prepositional phrase, "from the foundation of the world," is modifying "works,"...

VVVVVVV

Read this! | | | | V

Appeal to the stone. Make the argument, Glorydaz. An argument made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. I didn't do an in-depth Bible study on the verse before posting that, GD. What do you think it means? God created everything that was created. Time isn't being...

https://kgov.com/nice You're free to do as you wish. If you think that what I have said does that, then point it out to me, and show me how keeping it with other things you've said should change my response. Indeed. Because And yet, I'm pretty sure I've posted the most scripture so far...

It is. God is describing what he will do in those circumstances. Saying it doesn't make it so. "A convention of language used to convey information about the sequence and duration of events relative to other events." "Time of life" here is a figure of speech which means a woman's menstrual...

It's a convention of language. It doesn't exist, like a car, wallet, or computer does. It's how we describe sequence. More begging the question. You have yet to establish that God created time. Again, this is begging the question that time is a thing that was created. "Things invisible"...

Probably. * In The Day That You Eat Of It: Jesus said, "I say unto you", over a hundred times. Christ's words are in the place of the Old Testament's four hundred plus, "Thus saith the Lord". For He is God. So with authority the Lord said, "Most assuredly, I say unto you, if anyone keeps My...

Time isn't a "thing." It's a concept. It's a convention of language. No. Post 382.

If you cannot understand a book written for grown ups, you should not talk about it. (Paraphrased from a C.S. Lewis quote.)

"In the day" is a figure of speech that refers to a longer period of time. It itself is not a "day." Genesis 2:4 4 This is the history of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens,

So God went from [not being a man] to [being a man.] (While still remaining as God, of course.) That's sequence. A change. Thus, your entire argument up to now has been disproven. Now you're arguing my position. Thanks.

I know very well what it says. It says nothing about time being created. It says the heavens, the earth, and light, were created on the first day. It says nothing at all about time being created. Through reason. You cannot create something that requires itself to be created. Thus, "before...