Search results

If you support the HPT, then why do you still cling to a canopy? Yes, that's my point. The firmament of the heavens has no water above it. Sure it is. See below. Genesis 1:6-19. On day 2 God created a firmament in the midst of the waters, dividing waters above from waters below, called it...

Not when none exists, none was mentioned in scripture before that, and the phrasing fits a different theory better than it fits the idea of a canopy.

A virgin birth is perfectly rational given that God exists and can perform such a thing. Without God, it IS irrational.

Except that it contradicts their a priori belief in millions of years. Therefore it must be wrong, "because otherwise I've spent my entire career and possibly life believing in something that's wrong." And People don't like being shown to be wrong, especially when it comes to God. That's the...

You'd think that miracles would convince people that God is real, but they largely had the opposite effect. Evidence that God exists will more often than not turn people's hearts away from Him, sadly. That's just human nature.

Wrong. As stated above, we are not exactly in the center. Close to it, but not exactly, and it's because we're NOT that we can tell that we're close to it. See the following links which answers these ideas.

As opposed to the entire Bible, the geological, historical, cultural, evidences, and physics, that support the HPT. The firmament of the heavens is the sky (and space, because apparently I need to mention that too). The crux of the matter lies in determining what the firmament of day 2 is. If...

It really does not. Yes, you can interpret some passages to say that there was, but they don't actually say that unless you interpret it that way. That's called confirmation bias, by the way. There is PLENTY of data to go on. It doesn't help when one side ignores it. There's a lot we don't...

I thought that the universe was still expanding, but there's a point made on https://kgov.com/stretch that honestly makes more sense in my mind, and that's that God created the universe at it's current size, and then pulled the light from the stars like he caused the plants to grow, stretching...

I'm not saying that it's not based on scripture. I'm saying it's not defensible with scripture. Yes, scripture could be interpreted (key word) to argue that the earth is flat, but A) such an interpretation falls into conflict with other scripture, and B) such an interpretation doesn't fit...

The earth is central, but it is not the center, nor is it the center of the solar system, galaxy, etc. The sun and planets and moons do not orbit the earth, nor do the stars. That is what is meant by geocentrism, which was disproven by Copernicus and Galileo. In fact, we're not even in the...

What arguments? All you've made so far are claims.

And even if that were true, so what? Things still fall, the earth still pulls the atmosphere to itself at equilibrium with its tendency to expand, and I'm laying in my bed, all because of gravity.

There is plenty of scientific evidence that has been presented even here in this very thread for the HPT, which is a theory based on the heliocentric model.

You have a good point. I will concede, seeing as I've also done a bit more research, and even my own sources consider it to be something from the flood, and not the creation week. I will point out, however, that the NKJV nor the Hebrew text has the word "again" in it. But that's a moot point...

It's "Enyart." Get it right. One doesn't need to know what something is in order to know that it exists and works. Hypocrite. Your following is an example. If you get to do it, then so do I. Incorrect. A gas expands until the pressure is equalized. This includes the downward pressure of...

Ok, Here you go: All of these are arguments from your belief that the earth is geocentric, a belief that was disproven centuries ago simply by observing the movements of the planets. And we all know you're a flat-earther, so it's not surprising that you'd make such arguments.

That's just reality. Because it did. TNOs including Pluto and Charon, asteroids, meteoroids, meteors, and meteorites are all debris from the Fountains of the Great Deep. You gave no such evidence, only assertions. https://creationscience.com/onlinebook...

Read Ezekiel 31. You could always just watch Bryan Nickel's HPT videos on YouTube... He did an excellent job animating what it might have looked like. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpl6E8stJTiIi8wdLgYj1eXpp-4o1UUkZ Of course, God's would definitely be better, if we even care about it...

It's easier to catch up to a conversation doing it that way. Which could just as easily apply to the seas God made in Genesis 1:9-10...