Search results

What, exactly, do we believe without evidence? Be specific. Do you not hold yourself to high standards?

When you make absolute statements like "we cannot know anything to be right, absolutely," then yes, yes you do need to be absolutely sure. Because if you don't, then your statement is inconsistent with not only itself, but with reality. God exists. That's an absolute. "I exist." That's an...

Are you absolutely sure?

From Wikipedia: Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related and similar cases or data that may contradict that position...

Of course we put credence in both. Which only applies to things within the universe. The problem is that the first and second rules only apply to that which is natural, "inside" of nature (which includes the entire universe). They do NOT apply to that which is SUPERnatural, something...

A bullet fired falls at the same rate as a bullet dropped. In other words: Lateral motion does not affect the downward pull of gravity. This was shown in Mythbusters:

All drug dealers should be put to death.

https://phys.org/news/2022-04-differences-moon-sides-linked-colossal.html

Drug dealers should be put to death.

Why am I laughing so hard at this!!

Yes. And? You'll recall, I hope, that I'm against democracy as a whole, against a two- or multi-party system, against voting on morality.

The onus is on you to defend your position, Arty. This has earned you a ding.

The source of information has no bearing on the veracity of the information.

Yes, I'm aware. The reason they say this is that they've gotten away with it. There's no more point to pursuing a righting of this wrong, only to recognize that it did, in fact, happen.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/washington-secrets/new-report-255-000-excess-votes-for-biden-in-six-key-2020-states Over 250,000 votes in excess for Biden.

In a loving relationship, both husband and wife would consider themselves the property of the other, because the wife would "the husband's wife," and the husband would be "the wife's husband." Do you see the apostrophe-S after each of those words? That indicates possession. Possession, as in...

False, on both counts.

You're welcome. And? As Christians, we are to UPHOLD God's standard, not let it be pushed by the wayside by the wicked, and CERTAINLY not be apathetic as Christians and just give up because "God's law/standards hold no sway on earth currently." Apathy is a sin. I think the world would look...

https://theweeklyworldview.com/thats-entertainment/ Links to the stories mentioned here that are not present in this post can be found at the link above. That’s Entertainment! Posted on April 3, 2022 Listen as America’s most attractive audio engineer and her host provide your weekly alternative...

So what? "Witnesses" are not limited to "eyewitnesses." So tell me why you wouldn't also do so in the bedrooms of homosexuals so that we could execute them for their crimes? Or would you?