Search results

This is faulty logic that I am firmly convinced at this point is entirely intentional. Because natural immunity is more effective than the vaccine, doesn't mean that the vaccine is ineffective, which Marke here is clearly implying. The Pfizer vaccine is about 90% effective in preventing...

It might be about half if you count small children. It's more like 70 percent of adults and that number does not account for the people with natural immunity. And there are several ways to know how much it helps. In fact that very number you cite are discovered in a similar way. How is it that...

There is very little evidence that natural immunity is any longer lasting than vaccine immunity. It is clearly more effective immunity but how long it lasts is still an open question. And the vaccine has, in fact, saved thousands and thousand of lives.

You're lying. Prove it. Actually, don't bother. I won't read it. Welcome to my ever growing ignore list.

Hopeless. When you respond to the argument I've made rather than simply repeating your position, we can continue. Otherwise, I'm bored.

There was no government demand that anyone acceded to. It was made available and people wanted to go get it so they did and far few people are dead today because of it.

More openly false fear mongering. There has not been, nor is there likely to be a government mandated shot. Who knows and who cares? It isn't relevant. They will certainly be able to make far more of an argument in your hypothetical court room than you have on this real thread.

Of course we can! There is a field of study called statistics. Maybe you've heard of it. If you know the rate of infection and death rate of those both with and without the vaccine then you can know quite well how many lives have been saved. Of course your sample size is important. I figure...

Lie! Marke is a liar! He know for a fact that this is false because unless to too stupid to breath, everyone knows that something like 70% of the adult population of the United States and a huge percentage of the civilized world has gotten this shot will very little (statistically speaking) ill...

There are hundred of millions of people who got that shot and did not die, Marke. Pretty nearly everyone you know has gotten the shot and didn't die from it. And no one has deny that there have been people die shortly after having gotten the shot but there has been no arguments made that...

Then by all means refute them!!! Good god, man! What are we even here for if not to actually debate! Make the arguments, if you can! The fact that you refuse to do so is only so much evidence that you know your position is flat out nonsense.

Are you seriously unable to follow simple converstion? I was saying that your personal opinions do nothing to advance your case. Your desire to differ does not trump the explicit teaching of God's word! The point is that you need to do something more than merely state your position and pull...

Of course, yes there is denying it. There is actually very little evidence that tells us anything about the number of such deaths that had anything to do with the shot they received. A point that has been made here before and that you have routinely ignored and/or responded to by simply...

That's your response? What a pathetic joke. A subtantive discussion that last all of two whole posts. Yippee! Once again, your dogma blinds you to God's word! Even the verses you quote are ripped out of their context and are used to defend things that they say nothing at all about. You do this...

There are only two classes of people in the entire world. Those who have been fully vaccinated and those who have not been fully vaccinated. Please explain how the only two classes of people who exist can add up to a total of 11.97% of those who have tested positive. Where are are the other...

You think you're clever but the thread is all still here for the whole world to read, Marke. I've made arguments, you've made claims. I refute, you simply repeat yourself until you find something else you know is false to say.

I couldn't care less what you beg to differ about. Paul EXPLICITLY said that idols are nothing and to not allow anyone to judge you concerning the food you eat. He taught this just two chapters before the verse you quoted and then you INTENTIONALLY left out the portion of I Corinthians 10 that...

"What can we conclude about other cases from that one case? Practically nothing at all. " That's exactly the point I made and precisely the opposite of the point he was making when he posted the link to the paper. All he wanted to do was to get people to click the link, see a bunch of scary...

Talk talk talk. Saying it doesn't make it so.

Stop lying.