Search results

THREE QUESTIONS TO DETERMINE IF THE TRINITY IS BIBLICALLY TRUE OR FALSE. If any one of these questions can be answered 'no,' then the Trinity can be rejected as an unbiblical belief. But if all three can be answered 'yes,' then the concept of the Trinity can be accepted as true. 1. Does the...

That also supports immoral claims like that two people of the same sex can get married? Three members of which voted in favor of Roe in the first place? There's not a whole lot of liberty these days, as a result of their actions. Maybe you've heard it said that Republicans are just...

"isn't very relevant" != "not relevant"

Calvinism isn't the truth, let alone with a capital T.

So are Re-publicans.

It may be an old thread, but it's not dead yet. Yes. The same way He created life elsewhere. Agreed. They don't. Actually, "Science" doesn't say anything. Scientists however (if they can even be called that) say lots of things. But that doesn't make those things correct. God made. Not...

Did you notice that Peter is speaking to Jews? "Enduring to the end" was the very thing Christ taught to the twelve, which He commanded whom to teach to the world. Paul, on the other hand, says this: And you He made alive, who were dead in trespasses and sins,in which you once walked...

Nope. One is saved through their belief.

Scripture says it is so. They did. What evidence do you have that they did not? Why would they have had to? Argument from silence is a logical fallacy. Which EVERY trinitarian believes. Duh. No, we don't. There's nothing convoluted about it. There's no folly in recognizing who...

It is. It was. It does. He is. It's not a matter of "either/or." It's "both/and." The Son of God IS God. If Jesus was not God, then He would not have been able to provide salvation in the first place, nor would He have any right to claiming God's will as His own. False. What...

And those he turns away from Him He sends to hell because they have no choice in the matter. What a horrible and unjust God you have.

Hypocrite. Like just picking up a Bible, opening it, and reading the words on the pages? Or does it have to be read in a specific approved of way for it to make any sense?

Not really. I did. Are you saying The Plot isn't honest or truthful? Not like this one. But like I said, "recommended."

Repeating yourself doesn't make what you said any less incorrect.

So you'll take what a church says over what scripture says, even though scripture is plain? That's real smart. Prove it. You won't. Which is why I said "recommend," not "requirement." Nope. Jesus preached the gospel of the Kingdom, and built the church of Israel with Him being the...

Your understanding is wrong. Lean not on your own understanding. For making it possible for men to respond to the gospel, yes. That's an entirely different matter than a person believing as a response to the gospel. There's two pies here. You're claiming they're the same pie. God is...

No. The decision to believe is a RESPONSE to God giving His Son. GOD is the first mover, not man.

How about it, B57? Is it possible for God to draw someone who is not saved?

28, not 31. 31 is describing the Tree, not Satan. The passage is talking about both. God is condemning the King of Tyre (a man), by describing Lucifer (the devil). Quite the condemnation! Which I don't disagree with, at least not outright, however, I would like to point out that Satan was...

Sadly, it's not even funny anymore...